W BIAŁYMSTOKU
Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/15650Pełny rekord metadanych
| Pole DC | Wartość | Język |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Cseres, Kati | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hwija, Karolina | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-20T13:33:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-12-20T13:33:14Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 28 nr 4, 2023, s. 131-144 | pl |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1689-7404 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/15650 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The Sped-Pro judgment concerns an action for annulment of an EU Commission decision rejecting a complaint alleging the abuse of a dominant position by the Polish state-owned railway company PKP Cargo. In this judgment, the General Court for the first time established a direct link between systematic deficiencies in the legal order of a Member State and the ability of its competition authority to investigate and take enforcement action under EU law. The General Court addressed issues of the rule of law as an element of effective competition law enforcement and the case allocation principles between the Commission and National Competition Authorities (NCAs) under the decentralised enforcement system of Regulation 1/2003. The General Court now requires the Commission to examine, when handling complaints, whether an NCA can actually enforce EU law effectively. | pl |
| dc.language.iso | en | pl |
| dc.publisher | Faculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2 | pl |
| dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 | - |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | - |
| dc.subject | case allocation | pl |
| dc.subject | decentralised enforcement | pl |
| dc.subject | independence | pl |
| dc.subject | mutual trust | pl |
| dc.subject | rule of law | pl |
| dc.title | Sped-Pro: The Impact of Rule-of-Law Backsliding on the Enforcement of (EU) Competition Law | pl |
| dc.type | Article | pl |
| dc.rights.holder | © 2023 Kati Cseres, Karolina Hwija published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. | pl |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.15290/bsp.2023.28.04.08 | - |
| dc.description.Email | Kati Cseres: k.j.cseres@uva.nl | pl |
| dc.description.Email | Karolina Hwija: k.hwija@uva.nl | pl |
| dc.description.Affiliation | Kati Cseres - University of Amsterdam, Netherlands | pl |
| dc.description.Affiliation | Karolina Hwija - University of Amsterdam, Netherlands | pl |
| dc.description.references | Brook O., and Cseres K.J., Policy Report: Priority Setting in EU and National Competition Law Enforcement, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3930189. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Commission Decision No. 773/2004 on the case of AT.40459 (COM 12.08.2019). | pl |
| dc.description.references | Commission Notice on Cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities (O.J. C 101, 27.04.2004, p. 43). | pl |
| dc.description.references | Commission Staff Working Document, Enhancing Competition Enforcement by the Member States’ Competition Authorities: Institutional and Procedural Issues, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52014SC0231&from=EN. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (O.J. L 1, 16.12.2002, p. 1). | pl |
| dc.description.references | Cseres K.J., The Commission’s Missed Opportunity to Reclaim Competition Law for the Rechtsstaat, https://verfassungsblog.de/the-commissions-missed-opportunity-to-reclaim-competition-law-for-the-rechtsstaat/. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Cseres K.J., EU Competition Law and Democracy in the Shadow of Rule of Law Backsliding, (in:) Colombo C., Eliantonio M., Wright K. (eds.), The Evolving Governance of EU Competition Law in a Time of Disruptions: A Constitutional Perspective, forthcoming, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4032499. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Directive (EU) 2019/1 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 to empower the competition authorities of the Member States to be more effective enforcers and to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market (O.J. L 11, 11.12.2018, p. 3). | pl |
| dc.description.references | European Commission, Recommendation for Council Recommendation on the 2022 National Reform Programme of Hungary and delivering a Council opinion on the 2022 Convergence Programme of Hungary, https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2022–05/2022-european-semester-csr-hungary_en.pdf. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Judgment of CJEU of 26 February 1986 on the case of M.H. Marshall v. Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority (Teaching), 152/84. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Judgment of CJEU of 14 December 2000 on the case of Masterfoods Ltd v. HB Ice Cream Ltd, C 344/98. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Judgment of CJEU of 25 July 2018 on the case of ML, C 220/18 PPU. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Judgment of GC of 18 September 1992 on the case of Automec Srl v. Commission of the European Communities, T 24/90. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Judgment of GC of 3 July 2007 on the case of Au Lys de France SA v. Commission of the European Communities, T 458/04. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Judgment of GC of 26 January 2005 on the case of Laurent Piau v. Commission of the European Communities, T 193/02. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Judgment of CJEU of 31 May 2005 on the case of Synetairismos Farmakopoion Aitolias and Akarnanias (Syfait) and Others v. GlaxoSmithKline plc and GlaxoSmithKline AEVE, C 53/03. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Judgment of CJEU of 3 May 2007 on the case of Advocaten voor de Wereld VZW v. Leden van de Ministerraad, C 303/05. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Judgment of CJEU of 5 April 2016 on the case of Pál Aranyosi and Robert Căldăraru v. Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Bremen, C 404/15 and C 659/15 PPU. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Judgment of CJEU of 25 July 2018 on the case of LM, C 216/18 PPU. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Judgment of CJEU of 24 June 2019 on the case of European Commission v. Republic of Poland, C 619/18. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Judgment of GC of 17 December 2014 on the case of Si.mobil telekomunikacijske storitive d.d. v. European Commission, T 201/11. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Judgment of GC of 16 May 2017 on the case of Agria Polska sp. z o.o. and Others v. European Commission, T 480/15. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Judgment of GC of 30 May 2013 on the case of Omnis Group Srl v. European Commission, T 74/11. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Judgment of GC of 9 February 2022 on the case of Sped-Pro S.A. v. European Commission, T 791/19. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Kelemen R.D., Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union, ‘Government and Opposition’ 2017, vol. 52, no. 2. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Kozak M., Mainardi J., Rights of Complainants before the European Commission: A Critical Analysis, ‘Journal of European Competition Law & Practice’ 2023, vol. 14, no. 3. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Malaga M., Does the ‘More Appropriate’ Authority Need to Be Independent? Rule of Law Implications for Case Referrals with Respect of Concentrations, ‘Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies’ 2022, vol. 15, no. 25. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Nehl H.P., Principles of Administrative Procedure in EC Law, Portland 1999. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Opinion 2/13 of CJEU of 18 December 2014 (Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU). | pl |
| dc.description.references | Presidency conclusions of the European Council of 15–16 October 1999 on the creation of an area of freedom, security and justice in the European Union (O.J. D/99, 15–16.10.1999, p. 14). | pl |
| dc.description.references | Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (O.J. L 433 I, 22.12.2020, p. 1). | pl |
| dc.description.references | Urbańska M., Sikora K., Important Changes to the Competition and Consumer Protection Act Are on the Way, https://cms-lawnow.com/en/ealerts/2023/02/important-changes-to-the-competitionand-consumer-protection-act-are-on-the-way. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Van Rompuy B., The European Commission’s Handling of Non-Priority Antitrust Complaints: An Empirical Assessment, ‘World Competition’ 2022, vol. 45, no. 2. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Van Rompuy B., Independence as a Prerequisite for Mutual Trust between EU Competition Enforcers: Case T-791/19, Sped-Pro v Commission, ‘Journal of European Competition Law & Practice’ 2022, vol. 13, no. 6. | pl |
| dc.description.references | White Paper on Modernisation of the Rules Implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the EC Treaty Decentralization (Commission Programme No. 99/027, 28.04.1999). | pl |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2719-9452 | - |
| dc.description.volume | 28 | pl |
| dc.description.number | 4 | pl |
| dc.description.firstpage | 131 | pl |
| dc.description.lastpage | 144 | pl |
| dc.identifier.citation2 | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze | pl |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-6696-8215 | - |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0009-0000-3123-2750 | - |
| Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2023, Vol. 28 nr 4 | |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
| Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP_28_4_K_Cseres_K_Hwija_Sped_Pro.pdf | 236,69 kB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL
