REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/15648
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorVan Cleynenbreugel, Pieter-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-20T10:36:56Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-20T10:36:56Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 28 nr 4, 2023, s. 117-130pl
dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/15648-
dc.description.abstractSince 1989, the Court of Justice of the European Union has recognised a privilege against self-incrimination for undertakings subject to public enforcement procedures on the basis of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. That privilege forms part of the fundamental rights of the defence. Over time, the privilege has been read into Article 6 ECHR and has gained ground in other domains of EU law as well. Against that background, the question arises as to whether the CJEU’s original case law in the field of EU competition law needs to be updated. This paper revisits that case law by comparing it with developments in the context of the ECHR and in other domains of EU law. It argues that, in light of those developments, a case law update may indeed prove necessary. However, such an update alone would not sufficiently address the practical difficulties currently surrounding the application of the privilege in practice. For that, more coordinated legislative action would be warranted.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2pl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectECHRpl
dc.subjectEU competition lawpl
dc.subjectfundamental rightspl
dc.subjectpublic enforcementpl
dc.subjectself-incriminationpl
dc.titleThe Privilege against Self-Incrimination in EU Competition Law: Time for a Case Law Update?pl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2023 Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2023.28.04.07-
dc.description.Emailpieter.vancleynenbreugel@uliege.bepl
dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of Liege, Belgiumpl
dc.description.referencesDaly Y., Pivaty A., Marchessi D., ter Vugt P., Human Rights Protections in Drawing Inferences from Criminal Suspects’ Silence, ‘Human Rights Law Review’ 2021, vol. 21, pp. 696–723.pl
dc.description.referencesHancox E., The Right to Remain Silent in EU Law, ‘Cambridge Law Journal’ 2021, vol. 80, pp. 228–231.pl
dc.description.referencesRiley A., Saunders and the Power to Obtain Information in Community and United Kingdom Competition Law, ‘European Law Review’ 2000, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 264–281.pl
dc.description.referencesTinière R., The Use of ECtHR Case Law by the CJEU: Instrumentalisation or Quest for Autonomy and Legitimacy? ‘European Papers’ 2023, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 323–330.pl
dc.description.referencesTreschel S., The Privilege against Self-Incrimination, (in:) S. Trechsel, S. Summers (eds.), Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings, Oxford 2006, pp. 340–359.pl
dc.description.referencesVan Cleynenbreugel P., BPost and Nordzucker: Searching for the Essence of Ne Bis in Idem in European Union Law, ‘European Constitutional Law Review’ 2023, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 357–374.pl
dc.description.referencesVeenbrink M., The Freedom from Self-Incrimination: A Strasbourg-Proof Approach? Cases C-466/19 P Qualcomm and C-481/19 P DB v Consob, ‘Journal of European Competition Law & Practice’ 2021, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 750–752.pl
dc.description.referencesVeenbrink M., The Privilege against Self-Incrimination in EU Competition Law: A Deafening Silence? ‘Legal Issues of Economic Integration’ 2015, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 119–142.pl
dc.description.referencesVesterdorf B., Legal Professional Privilege and the Privilege against Self-Incrimination in EC Law: Recent Developments and Current Issues, ‘Fordham International Law Journal’ 2004, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1179–1214.pl
dc.description.referencesWeyembergh A., Joncheray N., Punitive Administrative Sanctions and Procedural Safeguards: A Blurred Picture That Needs to Be Addressed, ‘New Journal of European Criminal Law’ 2016, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 190–209.pl
dc.description.referencesWillis P., ‘You Have the Right to Remain Silent…’, or Do You? The Privilege against Self-Incrimination Following Mannesmannrohren-Werke and Other Recent Decisions, ‘European Competition Law Review’ 2001, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 313–321.pl
dc.description.referencesWils W., The Role of the Hearing Officer in Competition Proceedings before the European Commission, ‘World Competition’ 2012, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 431–456.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2719-9452-
dc.description.volume28pl
dc.description.number4pl
dc.description.firstpage117pl
dc.description.lastpage130pl
dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7388-6883-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2023, Vol. 28 nr 4

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
BSP_28_4_P_Van_Cleynenbreugel_The_Privilege_against_Self-Incrimination.pdf233,62 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons