REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze
  4. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2023, Vol. 28 nr 4

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/15642
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorSzwarc, Monika-
    dc.date.accessioned2023-12-20T09:06:21Z-
    dc.date.available2023-12-20T09:06:21Z-
    dc.date.issued2023-
    dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 28 nr 4, 2023, s. 53-68pl
    dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/15642-
    dc.description.abstractThis article analyses the limits to Member States’ powers in the field of enforcing (criminal) penalties for infringements of EU law, with particular focus on the protection of the EU’s financial interests. The article addresses the issue of the broad interpretation of the concept of ‘fraud’ within the meaning of Article 1(1) of the PFI Convention, which resulted in imposing an obligation on Member States to establish criminal penalties for certain serious VAT fraud. Next, the article analyses the requirements of effectiveness and equivalence of penalties established in domestic law for infringements of EU law, which may affect not only the severity of penalties, but also the rules of criminal procedure (limitation periods in pre-trial and judicial proceedings). Finally, the article presents the main developments in the context of limitations of ius puniendi, which stem from the obligation to protect fundamental rights under the Charter of Fundamental Rights.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2pl
    dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
    dc.subjectenforcement of EU lawpl
    dc.subjectEU criminal lawpl
    dc.subjecteffectiveness of EU lawpl
    dc.subjectprotection of fundamental rightspl
    dc.subjectPFI Conventionpl
    dc.subjectPFI Directivepl
    dc.subjectprotection of financial interests of the EUpl
    dc.titleEnforcement of EU Law: Effectiveness and Fundamental Rights as Limits to the Ius Puniendi Exercised by Member States in Fiscal (Criminal) Proceedingspl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2023 Monika Szwarc published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
    dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2023.28.04.03-
    dc.description.Emailmonika.szwarc@inp.pan.plpl
    dc.description.AffiliationPolish Academy of Sciences, Polandpl
    dc.description.referencesBaranowski K., Ograniczenie stosowania zasady ne bis in idem na podstawie art. 52 ust. 1 Karty praw podstawowych Unii Europejskiej. Glosa do wyroku TS z dnia 20 marca 2018 r., C-524/15, ‘Europejski Przegląd Sądowy’ 2020, no. 2, pp. 33–46.pl
    dc.description.referencesBonelli M., The Taricco Saga and the Consolidation of Judicial Dialogue in the European Union, ‘Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law’ 2018, no. 3, pp. 357–373.pl
    dc.description.referencesDougan M., From Velvet Glove to the Iron Fist: Criminal Sanctions for the Enforcement of Union Law, (in:) M. Cremona (ed.), Compliance and Enforcement of EU Law, Oxford 2012, pp. 74–131.pl
    dc.description.referencesGil Ibanez A.J., The Administrative Supervision and Enforcement of EC Law: Powers, Procedures and Limits, Oxford/Portland 1999.pl
    dc.description.referencesHancox E., The Meaning of ‘Implementing’ EU Law under Article 51(1) of the Charter: Åkerberg Fransson, ‘Common Market Law Review’ 2013, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1411–1431.pl
    dc.description.referencesHarding C., Models of Enforcement: Direct and Delegated Enforcement and the Emergence of a ‘Joint Action’ Model, (in:) C. Harding, B. Swart (eds.), Enforcing European Community Rules, Dartmouth 1996, pp. 22–42.pl
    dc.description.referencesHarding C., Swart B. (eds.), Enforcing European Community Rules, Dartmouth 1996.pl
    dc.description.referencesLo Schiavo G., The Principle of Ne Bis in Idem and the Application of Criminal Sanctions: Of Scope and Restrictions, ‘European Constitutional Law Review’ 2018, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 644–663.pl
    dc.description.referencesManacorda S., The Taricco Saga: A Risk or Opportunity for European Criminal Law, ‘New Journal of European Criminal Law’ 2018, no. 1, pp. 4–11.pl
    dc.description.referencesManes V., Some Lessons from the Taricco Saga, ‘New Journal of European Criminal Law’ 2018, no. 1, pp. 12–17.pl
    dc.description.referencesMitsilegas V., Judicial Dialogue in Three Silences: Unpacking Taricco, ‘New Journal of European Criminal Law’ 2018, no. 1, pp. 38–42.pl
    dc.description.referencesMortelmans K., General Aspects of Europeanization and Horizontalization of Enforcement, (in:) J.A.E. Vervaele (ed.), Compliance and Enforcement of European Community Law, The Hague/ London/Boston 1999, pp. 51–69.pl
    dc.description.referencesPiccirilli G., The ‘Taricco Saga’: The Italian Constitutional Court Continues Its European Journey, ‘European Constitutional Law Review’ 2018, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 814–833.pl
    dc.description.referencesRauchegger C., National Constitutional Rights and the Primacy of EU Law: M.A.S., ‘Common Market Law Review’ 2018, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1521–1547.pl
    dc.description.referencesScholten M., EU (Shared) Law Enforcement: Who Does What and How? (in:) S. Montaldo, F. Costamagna, A. Miglio (eds.) EU Law Enforcement: The Evolution of Sanctioning Powers, London/New York 2021, pp. 7–23.pl
    dc.description.referencesSicurella R., Effectiveness of EU Law and Protection of Fundamental Rights: The Questions Settled and the New Challenges after the ECJ Decision in the M.A.S. and M.B. Case (C-42/17), ‘New Journal of European Criminal Law’ 2018, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 24–30.pl
    dc.description.referencesSzwarc M., Effectiveness of EU Law and Protection of Fundamental Rights: In Search of Balance in the Context of the Ne Bis in Idem Principle, ‘Studia Prawnicze’ 2019, no. 4, pp. 37–58.pl
    dc.description.referencesSzwarc-Kuczer M., Kompetencje Unii Europejskiej w dziedzinie harmonizacji prawa karnego materialnego, Warsaw 2011.pl
    dc.description.referencesTimmerman M., Balancing Effective Criminal Sanctions with Effective Fundamental Rights Protection in Cases of VAT Fraud: Taricco, ‘Common Market Law Review’ 2016, pp. 779–796.pl
    dc.description.referencesVervaele J.A.E., Compliance and Enforcement of European Community Law, The Hague/London/Boston 1999.pl
    dc.description.referencesViganò F., Melloni Overruled? Considerations on the ‘Taricco II’ Judgment of the Court of Justice, ‘New Journal of European Criminal Law’ 2018, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 18–23.pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2719-9452-
    dc.description.volume28pl
    dc.description.number4pl
    dc.description.firstpage53pl
    dc.description.lastpage68pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7885-8021-
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2023, Vol. 28 nr 4

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    BSP_28_4_M_Szwarc_Enforcement_of_EU_Law.pdf232,08 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons