REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/15100
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorSakowicz, Andrzej-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-03T10:34:07Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-03T10:34:07Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal, 2022, Vol. 8, Número 1, p. 47-84pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/15100-
dc.description.abstractDetention on remand is intrinsically linked to the fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual and, in particular, to personal freedom, the right to a fair trial and the principle of the presumption of innocence. This paper explores the constitutional dimension of the application of detention on remand in Poland. Its first part outlines the constitutional values that are violated as a result of detention on remand. The status of the principle of proportionality is pointed out, both in constitutional law and in the criminal law procedure. In further parts, the article presents the role of the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland and analyzes its case law on detention on remand. The jurisprudence of the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland emphasizes the directive to minimize the duration and the principle of proportionality of preventive measures, which imply that detention on remand may only be used ultima ratio. In particular, the paper focuses on the rulings concerning the premises for detention on remand, the access to the file of the pre-trial proceedings in the part concerning the decision to apply detention on remand, the access of the persons detained on remand to defense counsels, the duration of detention on remand, and the contact of the persons subject to the most severe preventive measure with their loved ones.pl
dc.description.abstractPrisão cautelar é intrinsicamente relacionada aos direitos e liberdades individuais do indivíduo e, em particular, com a liberdade pessoal, o direito ao devido processo e o princípio da presunção de inocência. Este artigo explora a dimensão constitucional da aplicação da prisão cautelar na Polônia. Sua primeira parte destaca os valores constitucionais que são violadas em consequência da prisão cautelar. O status do princípio da proporcionalidade é ressaltado, tanto no direito constitucional como no direito processual penal. Posteriormente, o artigo apresente o papel do Tribunal Constitucional da Polônia e analisa a sua jurisprudência sobre prisão cautelar, que enfatiza a diretiva para minimizar a duração e o princípio da proporcionalidade das medidas cautelares, o qual determina que a prisão cautelar pode ser utilizada como como ultima ratio. Em particular, a pesquisa analisa decisões que tratam do acesso aos autos da investigação na parte relacionada à prisão cautelar, do acesso da pessoa detida ao advogado, da duração da prisão cautelar e do contato do preso com seus familiares.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherBrazilian Institute of Criminal Procedure (IBRASPP)pl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectdetention on remandpl
dc.subjectthe Constitutional Tribunalpl
dc.subjectcriminal proceedingspl
dc.subjectaccess to a lawyerpl
dc.subjectaccess to the file of pre-trial proceedingspl
dc.subjectPolandpl
dc.subjectprisão cautelarpl
dc.subjectTribunal Constitucionalpl
dc.subjectprocesso penalpl
dc.subjectacesso à defesa técnicapl
dc.subjectacesso aos autos da investigaçãopl
dc.subjectPolôniapl
dc.titleThe impact of the case law of the Constitutional Tribunal on the standard of detention on remand in Polandpl
dc.title.alternativeO impacto da jurisprudência do Tribunal Constitucional nos parâmetros de prisão cautelar na Polôniapl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.682-
dc.description.Emailsakowicz@uwb.edu.plpl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteProfessor at the University of Bialystok, Poland; the Faculty of Law; the Department of Criminal Procedure. PhD in Law.pl
dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of Bialystok, Polandpl
dc.description.referencesBAKER, Estella; HARKIN, Tricia; MITSILEGAS, Valsamis; PERŠAK, Nina. The Need for and Possible Content of EU Pre-trial Detention Rules, Eucrim, 3, pp. 221-229, 2020, https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2020-020.pl
dc.description.referencesHERMELIŃSKI, Wojciech; NITA-ŚWIATŁOWSKA, Barbara. Tymczasowe aresztowanie ze względu na grożącą oskarżonemu surową karę (Provisional detention due to the potential severity of penalty). Palestra. n. 6, pp. 14-24. 2018.pl
dc.description.referencesHERLIN-KARNELL, Ester. The Power of Comparative Constitutional Law Reasoning in European Criminal Law Procedure. Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law 2019, vol. 13, p. 1-27, https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2018-0047.pl
dc.description.referencesJAMRÓZ, Lech. The Constitutional Tribunal in Poland in the Context of Constitutional Judiciary. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Temida 2, 2014.pl
dc.description.referencesJASIŃSKI, Wojciech; KREMENS, Karolina. Poland. International Encyclopedia of Laws: Criminal Law. The Netherlands. Kluwer Law International, 2019.pl
dc.description.referencesKARDAS, Piotr; WILIŃSKI, Paweł: O niekonstytucyjności odmowy dostępu do akt sprawy w postępowaniu w przedmiocie tymczasowego aresztowania (Concerning the Unconstitutionality of the Refusing to Inspect Files in the Proceeding in Order to Issue a Preliminary Detention). Palestra. n. 7-8, pp. 23-35, 2008.pl
dc.description.referencesKLEPCZYŃSKI, Adam; KŁADOCZNY, Piotr; WIŚNIEWSKA, Katarzyna. The Trials of Pre-trial Detention. Report. A review of the existing practice of application of pre-trial detention in Poland. Warsaw: The Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights, 2019, pp. 7-32.pl
dc.description.referencesMANCANO, Leandro. The Use of the Charter and Pre-trial Detention in EU Law: Constraints and Possibilities for Better Protection of the Right to Liberty. European Papers. vol. 6. n. 1, pp. 125-139, 2021, https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/457.pl
dc.description.referencesMARTUFI, Adriano; PERISTERIDOU Christina. The Purposes of Pre-Trial Detention and the Quest for Alternatives, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, vol. 28, n. 2, p. 155, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-bja10002.pl
dc.description.referencesMCSHERRY, Bernadette. Pretrial and Civil Detention of “Dangerous” Individuals in Common Law Jurisdictions. In: BROWN, Darryl K.; TURNER, Jenia I.; WEISSER, Bettina. The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. pp. 522-540. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190659837.013.29.pl
dc.description.referencesMERKEL, Grischa. Detention before Trial and Civil Detention of Dangerous Individuals. In BROWN, Darryl K.; TURNER, Jenia Iontcheva; WEISSER, Bettina. The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. p. 508. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190659837.013.28.pl
dc.description.referencesMORGENSTERN, Christine; Chapter 21 Poland. In: VAN KALMTHOUT, Anton; KNAPEN, Marije; MORGENSTERN, Christine (eds.). Pre-trial Detention in the European Union An Analysis of Minimum Standards in Pre-trial Detention and the grounds for Regular Review in the Member States of the EU. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2009, pp. 717-752.pl
dc.description.referencesMORGENSTERN, Christine; KROMREY, Hans. Towards Pre-trial Detention as Ultima Ratio. Available at: https://www.irks.at/detour/DE%201st%20National%20report%20031116.pdf. Accessed on March 12, 2022.pl
dc.description.referencesPILITOWSKI, Bartosz. Current practice of applying pre-trial detention in Poland. Report from empirical research, Court Watch Poland Foundation. Available at: https://courtwatch.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/fcwp_PTD_en.pdf Access on: March 13, 2022.pl
dc.description.referencesPILITOWSKI, Bartosz. A Measure of Last Resort? The practice of pre-trial detention decision making in the EU. Available at: <https://fairtrials.org/app/uploads/2022/01/A-Measure-of-Last-Resort-Full-Version.pdf>, pp. 67-71. Access on: March 13, 2022.pl
dc.description.referencesRAWLS, John. Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.pl
dc.description.referencesSAKOWICZ, Andrzej. Suspect’s access to a lawyer at an early stage of criminal proceedings in the view the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, vol. 7, n. 3, p. 1979-2009, set./dez.2021. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v7i3.565.pl
dc.description.referencesSKORUPKA, Jerzy. Standard dostępu do informacji o podstawie dowodowej tymczasowego aresztowania w prawie unii europejskiej i prawie polskim (Standard of Access to Information about the Evidential Base of Provisional Detention in European Union and Polish Law). Przegląd Prawea i Administracji, v. CXX, n. 2, pp. 241-253, 2020. https://doi.org/10.19195/0137-1134.120.66.pl
dc.description.referencesŚLEDZIŃSKA-SIMON, Anna. Proportionality Analysis by the Polish Constitutional Tribunal. In KREMNITZER Mordechai; STEINER Talya; LANG Andrej (dds.). Proportionality in Action: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives on the Judicial Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020, pp. 385-457, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108596268.008.pl
dc.description.referencesWALTOŚ, Stanisław; HOFMAŃSKI, Piotr. Proces karny [Criminal process], Warszawa: WoltersKluwer, 2020.pl
dc.description.referencesWĄSEK-WIADEREK, Małgorzata. Zasada równości stron w polskim procesie karnym w perspektywie prawnoporównawczej [The principle of equality of arms in the Polish criminal process from a comparative-law perspective], Kraków: Zakamycze, 2003.pl
dc.description.referencesWICZANOWSKA, Hanna. The Adequacy of The Constitutional Complaint as Extraordinary Means of Human Rights Protection - A Comparison of Polish and German Solutions. Torun InternaƟonal Studies. v. 11, n. 1, pp. 5-23. 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2018.00.pl
dc.description.referencesWILIŃSKI, Paweł; Proces karny w świetle Konstytucji [Criminal Trial in the Light of the Constitution]. Warszawa:Wolters Kluwer, pp. 202-220, 2011.pl
dc.description.referencesWILIŃSKI, Paweł. Odmowa dostępu do akt sprawy w postępowaniu przygotowawczym [Refusal to grant access to case files in pre-trial proceedings], Prokuratura i Prawo, no. 11, p. 74-85. 2006pl
dc.identifier.eissn2525-510X-
dc.description.volume8pl
dc.description.number1pl
dc.description.firstpage47pl
dc.description.lastpage84pl
dc.identifier.citation2Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penalpl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6599-4876-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Artykuły naukowe (WP)

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
A_Sakowicz_The_impact_of_the_case_law_of_the_Constitutional_Tribunal.pdf524,48 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons