REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/14779
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorEidsvaag, Tine-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-20T08:16:20Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-20T08:16:20Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationEastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2021, p. 35-48pl
dc.identifier.issn2544-9214-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/14779-
dc.description.abstractThe main aim of this article is to investigate some encounters between the Norwegian system of economic risk-pooling for labour engaging individuals, and the emerging digital platform economy. The author argues that Norwegian labour and employment law, as well as social insurance law, may fall short in alleviating the economic strains of the typical digital platform worker in cases of loss of income. This is partly due to legal classification: Where Norwegian labour and employment law operates with two categories of labour engaging individuals: employees and non-employees, Norwegian social insurance law includes three categories: employees, freelancers, and self-employed persons. Employees are entitled to the most comprehensive and high-level coverage of income losses. The legal status of digital platform workers is basically unclear, and they may belong to each of the three categories, depending on contract terms. It is also argued that the Covid 19-pandemic has reinforced the differences between salaried, full-time, employees, and atypical workers such as digital platform workers. The compensation measures issued by the Norwegian state to cover income losses in relation to the pandemic did not meet the needs of the typical –freelance –digital platform worker to the same extent as those of undertakings and ‘traditional’ employees. The article suggests some measures to clarify the legal position and to give a better coverage for digital platform workers in cases of loss of income.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Bialystok, Faculty of Law, Polandpl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Polska-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.pl-
dc.subjectdigital platform workpl
dc.subjectconcept of ‘worker’pl
dc.subjectemployment lawpl
dc.subjectsocial insurance lawpl
dc.subjectCovid 19-pandemicpl
dc.titleSocial Protection of Digital Platform Workers under Norwegian Lawpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderCopyright:© 2021 Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations. Submitted for open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) licensepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/eejtr.2021.05.02.03-
dc.description.EmailEidsvaag@uib.nopl
dc.description.AffiliationFaculty of Law, University of Bergen, Norwaypl
dc.description.referencesHjelmeng, E. (2016). The Concept of an «Undertaking» –On the Borderline between Labour Law and Competition Law. In B.J. Mulder, M.J. Hotvedt, M. Nesvik & T.L. Sundet (Eds), Sui Generis: Festskrift til Stein Evju. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, s. 316-326.pl
dc.description.referencesHotvedt, M.J. (2016). Arbeidsgiveransvar i formidlingsøkonomien? Tilfellet Uber. Lov og rett, 55(8), 484–503. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3061-2016-08-03pl
dc.description.referencesHotvedt, M.J. (2018a).The contract-of-employment test renewed, A Scandinavian approach to platform work. Spanish Labour Law and Employment Relations Journal, 7(1-2):56.pl
dc.description.referencesHotvedt, M.J. (2018b). ARBEIDSTAKER –QUO VADIS? Den nyere utviklingen av arbeidstakerbegrepet [Employee –quo vadis? The newer development of the concept of employee], Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap (1), 42-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2018-01-02pl
dc.description.referencesHotvedt, M.J. (2020a). Kollektive forhandlinger for oppdragstakere? Rekkevidden av adgangen til å forhandle tariffavtaler i lys av internasjonal rettsutvikling [Collective bargaining for contractors? The scope of the right to conclude collective agreements in the light of development in international law]. Arbeidsrett, 17(1), 1-44.pl
dc.description.referencesHotvedt, M.J. (2020b). Protection of platform workers in Norway Part 2 Country report. Nordic future of work project 2017–2020: Working paper 09. Pillar VI. Fafo 2020. https://www.fafo.no/images/pub/2020/Nfow-wp9.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesJesnes, K. & Oppegaard S.M.N. (Eds) (2020).Platform Work in the Nordic Models: Issues, cases and responses’, Report from the project ‘The Future of Work, Opportunities and Challenges for the Nordic Models’, Nordic Council of Ministers. http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/temanord2020-513pl
dc.identifier.eissn2544-9737-
dc.description.volume5pl
dc.description.number2pl
dc.description.firstpage35pl
dc.description.lastpage48pl
dc.identifier.citation2Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relationspl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, 2021, Vol. 5, No. 2

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons