REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/14775
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorBulla, Martin-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-17T13:09:35Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-17T13:09:35Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationEastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2021, p. 7-22pl
dc.identifier.issn2544-9214-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/14775-
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to examine the development of the legal regulation of remote working arrangements in Slovak labour law and to determine the main legal issues that keep thistype of work from being more widely utilised in practice. To this end, the article analyses the applicable provisions of the Slovak Labour code, as they developed throughout the years, in particular the changes implemented in connection with the Covid-19npandemic. It also investigates other applicable sources of law, as well as case law and relevant literature. The main issues identified by the article that need to be addressed by the legislator, involve three areas: (i.) formulation of the place of work in the employment agreement, (ii.) working time and rest periods of remote workers and (iii.) the range of supervisory powers of the employer vis-à-vis remote workers. The author argues that the legislator ought to create more favourable and clear legal conditions for remote work and to enable this type of work to be performed under all contractual types recognised by Slovak labour law, not just in the (standard) employment relationship.pl
dc.description.sponsorshipThe paperpresents a partial research result of the project APVV-18-0443 “Penetration of labour law into other branches of private law (and vice versa)”, supported by the Slovak research and development agency (APVV).pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Bialystok, Faculty of Law, Polandpl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Polska-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.pl-
dc.subjecthome workpl
dc.subjectteleworkpl
dc.subjectremote workpl
dc.subjectplace of workpl
dc.subjectright to disconnectpl
dc.subjectcovid-19pl
dc.subjectworkplace privacypl
dc.titleLegal Regulation of Remote Work in Slovakia and the Covid-19 Pandemicpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderCopyright:© 2021 Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations. Submitted for open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) licensepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/eejtr.2021.05.02.01-
dc.description.Emailmas.bulla@gmail.compl
dc.description.AffiliationFaculty of Law, University of Trnava, Slovakiapl
dc.description.referencesBarancová, H. (2020). Domácka práca atelepráca. In Z. Nevolná & M. Hlušák(Eds.), Laudatio Alexandrovi Škrinárovi(pp 10-25). Trnava: Trnavská univerzita vTrnave, Právnická fakulta. Retrieved from http://publikacie.iuridica.truni.sk/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Laudatio-Alexandrovi-Skrinarovi_online.pdf.pl
dc.description.referencesBarancová, H. et al. (2019) Zákonník práce. (2nd edition). Bratislava: C.H. Beck.pl
dc.description.referencesBarancová, H., & Schronk, R. (2018). Pracovné právo (4th edition). Bratislava: Sprint 2pl
dc.description.referencesCase of Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], Application no. 27238/95.pl
dc.description.referencesCase of Copland v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 62617/00.pl
dc.description.referencesCase of Klass and others v. Germany, Application no. 5029/71; I. ÚS 274/05, II. ÚS 280/09-16.pl
dc.description.referencesCase of Lüdi v. Switzerland, Application no. 12433/86.pl
dc.description.referencesCase of Menteş and Others v. Turkey, Application no. 23186/94.pl
dc.description.referencesCase of Niemietz v. Germany, Application no. 13710/88.pl
dc.description.referencesCase of Petri Sallinen and Others v. Finland, Application no. 50882/99.pl
dc.description.referencesCase of Saber v. Norway, Application no. 459/18.pl
dc.description.referencesCase of Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, Application no. 74336/01.pl
dc.description.referencesConstitution of the Slovak Republic (No. 460/1992 Coll.).pl
dc.description.referencesCouncil Directive 89/654/EEC of 30 November 1989 concerning the minimum safety and health requirements for the workplace.pl
dc.description.referencesCouncil directive 90/270/EEC on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment.pl
dc.description.referencesDecree of the Ministry of Labour, Social Affairs and Family of the Slovak Republic No. 508/2009 Coll.pl
dc.description.referencesETUC, UNICE, UEAPME & CEEP (2002).Framework agreement on. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?mode=dsw&docId=10418&langId=en.pl
dc.description.referencesEurofound (2010). Telework in the European Union. Retrieved from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_files/docs/eiro/tn0910050s/tn0910050s.pdf.pl
dc.description.referencesEurofound (2020). Telework and ICT-based mobile work: Flexible working in the digital age. New forms of employment series. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2806/337167.pl
dc.description.referencesEurofound (2021). Working during COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/data/covid-19/working-teleworking.pl
dc.description.referencesGreguš, J. (2016). Právna úprava domáckej práce a telepráce v kontextu novely Zákonníka práce. Paper presented at the conference „Pracovní právo 2016 na téma Zákoník práce v novelizaci, důchodová reforma vakci“. Masaryk university, Faculty of Law. Retrieved from https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/pracpravo2016/files/009.html#_ftn12.pl
dc.description.referencesInternational Labour Organisation(1996). C-177 Home Work Convention. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312322.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgement of the Court of Justice of the EU of 14 May 2019 in case C‑55/18, Federación de Servicios de Comisiones Obreras (CCOO) vs. Deutsche Bank SAE.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgement of the Supreme court of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic R 10/1971.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgement of the Supreme court of the Slovak republic 5 Cdo 81/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgement of the Supreme court of the Slovak republic 5 Cdo 81/2010.pl
dc.description.referencesJudgment of 6 July 2000, C-11/99 Margrit Dietrich v Westdeutscher Rundfunk.pl
dc.description.referencesLabour Code (2012). Act No. 311/2001 Coll. of 2 July 2001, as amended. English version. Retrieved from https://www.employment.gov.sk/files/praca-zamestnanost/vztah-zamestnanca-zamestnavatela/zakonnik-prace/zakonnik-prace-anglicka-verzia-labour-code-full-wording-2012.pdf.pl
dc.description.referencesMemorandum to the amendment No. 76/2021 Coll. Retrieved from https://www.nrsr.sk/web/Default.aspx?sid=zakony/zakon&MasterID=8022.pl
dc.description.referencesNational labour inspectorate (n.d.), Homeoffice a BOZP –aktualizácia. Retrieved July 30, 2021 from https://www.ip.gov.sk/homeoffice-a-bozp/.pl
dc.description.referencesOlšovská, A. (2017). Pracovný pomer. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR.pl
dc.description.referencesOlšovská, A., & Laclavíková, M. (2018). Miesto výkonu práce a jeho modifikácie. In M. Švec & M. Bulla (Eds.), Práca 4.0, digitálna spoločnosť a pracovné právo(pp 36-48). Bratislava: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, zastúpenie vSR.pl
dc.description.referencesRegulation of the Government of the Slovak republic No. 276/2006 Coll. on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display units.pl
dc.description.referencesRegulation of the Government of the Slovak republic No. 391/2006 Coll. on the minimum safety and health requirements for the workplace.pl
dc.description.referencesRegulation of the Government of the Slovak Republic No. 392/2006 Coll. on the minimum safety and health requirements for the use of work equipment.pl
dc.description.referencesSchronk, R. (2018) Zákonník práce ajeho novelizácie. Šamorín: Heuréka Heuréka.pl
dc.description.referencesTomšej, J. (2015). Home-office a problematika bezpečnosti a ochrany zdraví při práci. In: J. Pichrt, & J. Morávek (Eds.), Atypická zaměstnání –cesta k vyšší zaměstnanosti?Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR.pl
dc.description.referencesVarga, P. (2016). Pracovný čas pracovníkov bez stáleho pracoviska a nárok na náhradu za nevyčerpanú dovolenku za kalendárny rok v prípade úmrtia pracovníka. Justičná revue, 68(12), 1436-1443.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2544-9737-
dc.description.volume5pl
dc.description.number2pl
dc.description.firstpage7pl
dc.description.lastpage22pl
dc.identifier.citation2Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relationspl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2575-6512-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations, 2021, Vol. 5, No. 2

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
EEJTR_2021_Vol_5_No_2_M_Bulla_Legal_Regulation_of_Remote_Work_in_Slovakia.pdf369,75 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons