REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/12971
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorKnapp, Magdalena-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-05T06:01:43Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-05T06:01:43Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 27 nr 1, 2022, s. 159-171pl
dc.identifier.issn1689–7404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/12971-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this paper is to analyse critically the problems stemming from the current model of enforcing protection in cases of online copyright infringements. The Internet allows for the easy dissemination and exploitation of copyrighted works globally. Remote and immediate access to content may result in simultaneous infringement on a worldwide scale. There is a long history of disputes over the enforcement of protection with regard to online copyright infringement, and while new laws and judgments are passed there are still no effective remedies nor consensus regarding a common approach to the problem of the multiplicity of applicable laws and jurisdictions in the event of infringement – a problem that derives mainly from the principle of the territoriality of intellectual property rights. Throughout the years there have been many attempts to solve it, mostly in the form of soft law instruments. None of the recommendations are binding, therefore the obligation to reconcile the right to the protection of copyright with the limits of the jurisdiction falls on national courts. As a consequence, the current legal status quo does not provide sufficient predictability to the outcome of litigation.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Białystok; Temida 2pl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pl
dc.subjectenforcement of copyrightpl
dc.subjectextraterritorial scope of remediespl
dc.subjectjurisdictionpl
dc.subjectonline copyright infringementpl
dc.titleThe Scope of Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Intellectual Property Disputes: Tackling Online Copyright Infringementspl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2022 Magdalena Knapp, published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2022.27.01.10-
dc.description.Emailm.knapp@uwb.edu.plpl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteMagdalena Knapp – doktor, asystent w Katedrze Prawa Własności Intelektualnej, Prawa Gospodarczego Publicznego i Prawa Pracy Wydziału Prawa Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.pl
dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of Bialystok, Polandpl
dc.description.referencesEechoud, M. van, Alternatives to the Lex Protectionis as the Choice-of-Law Rule for Initial Ownership of Copyright, (in:) J. Drexl and A. Kur (eds.), Intellectual Property and Private International Law. Heading for the Future, Oxford 2005.pl
dc.description.referencesEUIPO, Study on Dynamic Blocking Injunctions in the European Union, https://euipo.europa.eu/tunnel-web/secure/webdav/guest/document_library/observatory/documents/reports/2021_Dynamic_Blocking_Injuctions/2021_Study_on_Dynamic_Blocking_Injuctions_in_the_European_Union_FullR_en.pdf.pl
dc.description.referencesFeraci O., Digital Rights and Jurisdiction: The European Approach to Online Defamation and IPRs Infringements, (in:) E. Carpanelli, N. Lazzerini, Use and Misuse of New Technologies. Contemporary Challenges in International and European Law, New York 2019.pl
dc.description.referencesFrosio G., Enforcement of European Rights on a Global Scale, (in:) E. Rosati (ed.), Handbook of European Copyright Law, London 2021.pl
dc.description.referencesKlafkowska-Waśniowska K., Zamieszczanie odesłań internetowych a zakres autorskich praw majątkowych, „Białostockie Studia Prawnicze” 2015, vol. 19.pl
dc.description.referencesKur A. and Maunsbach U., Choice of Law and Intellectual Property Rights, “Oslo Law Review” 2019, vol. 6, no. 1.pl
dc.description.referencesLundstedt L., Putting Right Holders in the Centre: Bolagsupplysningen and Ilsjan (C-194/16): What Does It Mean for International Jurisdiction over Transborder Intellectual Property Infringement Disputes? “IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law” 2018, vol. 49.pl
dc.description.referencesLundstedt L., Th e Newly Adopted Hague Judgments Convention: A Missed Opportunity for Intellectual Property, “IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law” 2019, vol. 50.pl
dc.description.referencesMatusiak I., Konsekwencje (braku) zmian przepisów prawa autorskiego a status prawny gier komputerowych, „Białostockie Studia Prawnicze” 2015, vol. 19.pl
dc.description.referencesPolčák R., Territoriality of Copyright Law, (in:) P. Szczepanik, P. Zahrádka, J. Macek, P. Stepan (eds.), Digital Peripheries. The Online Circulation of Audiovisual Content from the Small Market Perspective, New York 2020.pl
dc.description.referencesŚwierczyński M., Intellectual Property and Private International Law: High Time for a Dedicated EU Rome IP Regulation? „Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego” 2016, vol. 132.pl
dc.description.referencesWIPO, When Private International Law Meets Intellectual Property Law: A Guide for Judges https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_1053.pdf.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2719–9452-
dc.description.volume27pl
dc.description.number1pl
dc.description.firstpage159pl
dc.description.lastpage171pl
dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0147-3056-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Artykuły naukowe (WP)
Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2022, Vol. 27 nr 1

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons