REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/11881
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorChmielecki, Konrad-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-05T10:33:52Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-05T10:33:52Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationStudia Medioznawcze, 2021, tom 22, nr 3(86), s. 962-994pl
dc.identifier.issn2451-1617-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/11881-
dc.description.abstractScientific objective: The concept of ocularcentrism as the dominant ideology acts as a very important role within visual shaping photographic models of vision used by social media and photographic images. The paper focuses on the concept of ocularcentrism as the dominant effect of sight in visual culture, the problems of “ocularcentric discourse,” presented in forms of the “phono-logo-centrism” paradigm, and ocularcentric ways of seeing, or scopic regimes: “Cartesian perspectivalism,” the “Art of Describing,” “baroque vision,” and photographic models of vision that have been discussed in two theoretical contexts: Lev Manovich’s Software Studies and Cultural Analytics methods and Zygmunt Bauman’s consumer society theory that can be understood as the “embodied eye” and the “armed eye” concepts. Research methods: I suggest the use of critical methods of Martin Jay’s Visual Studies in the perspective of the history of visuality from the ancient Greek to the philosophical, twentieth-century French thought, undertaking Software Studies and Cultural Analytics methods, in an analysis of the research project of Manovich’s “Phototrails,” as well as Bauman’s consumer society theory in an analysis of the photographic project of Alain Delorme’s “Totems.” Results and conclusions: I hope that exploring theoretical problems of visual culture will allow researchers to open a new field of reciprocal correspondence between the concept of ocularcentrism, photographic models of vision, Software Studies, and Cultural Analytics methods, as well as Bauman’s consumer society theory, based on the possibility of coming to conclusions, posing questions, and hypotheses. Cognitive value: The paper is an attempt to make a contribution to the hitherto unexplored research on the concept of ocularcentrism as the dominant effect of sight, subjecting to analysis the research project of Manovich’s “Phototrails,” in the perspective of Software Studies and Cultural Analytics methods within “media visualizations,” as well as the photographic project of Delorme’s “Totems,” in the perspective of Bauman’s consumer society theory, consumerism, consumption, and social exclusion.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherWydział Dziennikarstwa, Informacji i Bibliologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiegopl
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectAlain Delorme’s “Totems”pl
dc.subjectbaroque visionpl
dc.subjectconsumer society theorypl
dc.subjectLev Manovich’s “photographic models of vision”pl
dc.subjectscopic regimespl
dc.subjectthe “armed eye”pl
dc.subjectthe Art of Describingpl
dc.subjectthe Cartesian perspectivalismpl
dc.subjectthe concept of ocularcentrismpl
dc.subjectthe “embodied eye”pl
dc.titleThe Concept of Ocularcentrism & Photographic Models of Vision From the Perspectives of Software Studies and Cultural Analytics Methods of Social Media Images and the Consumer Society Theorypl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderCreative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne 4.0 Międzynarodowepl
dc.identifier.doi10.33077/uw.24511617.sm.2021.3.347-
dc.description.Emailk.chmielecki@uwb.edu.plpl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteKonrad Chmielecki – Ph.D., a researcher with habilitation in the field of cultural studies. His research interests include an interdisciplinary approach to visual culture studies, picture theory, visual studies, audiovisual media culture studies, media aesthetics, intermediality theory, film studies, and new media studies. His doctoral dissertation won a distinction in the 2nd edition of competition of the National Centre of Culture and the 3rd edition of the competition of the Polish Society of Aesthetics for Stefan Morawski Prize, for the best doctoral dissertation in the field of cultural studies and aesthetics. He is the author of two reviewed monographs: Estetyka intermedialności [The Aesthetics of Intermediality] (2008) and Widzenie przez kulturę. Wprowadzenie do teorii kultury wizualnej [Seeing Through Culture: An Introduction to the Theory of Visual Culture] (2018), as well as the editor of the collection of research papers: Teoria obrazu w naukach humanistycznych [Picture Theory in the Humanities] (2015). He is a member of the Polish Association of Cultural Studies, the Polish Society of Aesthetics, and the Polish Society for Film and Media Studies. Between 2009 and 2012, he was the head of a research project in the field of art studies, implemented at the University of Humanities and Economics in Łódź, funded by the habilitation grant of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, whose subject was visual culture studies. He participated in a habilitation research project involving research visits at New York University (2012), the University of Chicago (2012), the University of California at San Diego (2012), Internationales Forschungszentrum Kulturwissenschaften [the International Research Center for Cultural Studies] in Vienna (2011), and Zentrum für Kunst und Medien [the Center for Art and Media] in Karlsruhe (2011). He is currently working on his third scientific monograph, Kultura wizualna mediów społecznościowych [Visual Social Media Culture] and an anthology of English research papers: Kultura wizualna w erze mediów społecznościowych [Visual Culture in the Age of Social Media]. He has been collaborating with the Władysław Strzemiński Academy of Fine Arts in Łódź since 2016.pl
dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of Bialystokpl
dc.description.referencesAlberti, L.B. (1991). On Painting. M. Kemp (Ed.), C. Grayson (Trans.). London, New York: Penguin Books.pl
dc.description.referencesAlpers, S. (1984). The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.pl
dc.description.referencesAristotle. (1991). Metaphysics. H. Tredennick (Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesArnheim, R. (2004). Visual Thinking. Berkeley, London, Los Angeles: University of California Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBacon, F. (2008). The New Organon. L. Jardine & M. Silverthorne (Eds. and Trans.). Cambridge, Melbourne, New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBal, M. (2003). Visual Essentialism and Object of Visual Culture. Journal of Visual Culture, 2(1), 5–32. DOI: 10.11777/14704129030020101.pl
dc.description.referencesBaudry, J.–L. (1974/1975). The Ideological Effects of the Basic Cinematographic Apparatus. A. Williams (Trans.). Film Quarterly, 28(2), 39–47. DOI: 10.2307/1211632.pl
dc.description.referencesBauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The Human Consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBauman, Z. (2002). Society under Siege. Cambridge: Polity Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBauman, Z. (2004). Wasted Lives: Modernity and Its Outcasts. Cambridge: Polity Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBauman, Z. (2005). Work, Consumerism and New Poor. Maidenhead: Open University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBauman, Z. (2007). Consuming Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBauman, Z. (2012). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBenjamin, W. (1998). The Origin of German Tragic Drama. J. Osborne (Trans.). London: Verso.pl
dc.description.referencesBentham, J. (2001). The Works of Jeremy Bentham. J. Browing (Ed.). Vol. IV. Edinburgh, London: Adamant Media Corporation.pl
dc.description.referencesBerger, J. (1990). Ways of Seeing: Based on the BBC Television Series. London: Penguin Books.pl
dc.description.referencesBryson, N. (1986). Vision and Painting: The Logic of Gaze. London, New Haven: Yale University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBuci-Glucksmann, Ch. (1994). Baroque Reason: The Aesthetics of Modernity. P. Camiller (Trans.). London, New York, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.pl
dc.description.referencesBuci-Glucksmann, Ch. (2013). The Madness of Vision: On Baroque Aesthetics. D.Z. Baker (Trans.). Athens and Ohio: Ohio University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesCartwright, L. & Sturken, M. (2009). Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesCartwright, L. & Sturken, M. (2017). Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesChmielecki, K. (2018). Widzenie przez kulturę. Wprowadzenie do teorii kultury wizualnej. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Katedra.pl
dc.description.referencesCrary, J. (1996). Techniques of Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century, “An OCTOBER Book.” Cambridge, London, Massachusetts: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.pl
dc.description.referencesCrary, J. (2001). Suspensions of Perception: Attention, Spectacle, and Modern Culture, “An OCTOBER Book.” Cambridge, London, Massachusetts: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.pl
dc.description.referencesDa Vinci, L. (1956). Treatise on Painting. A.P. McMachon (Trans.). Vol. 1/2. Princeton: Princeton University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesDe Bolla, P. (1996). The Visibility of Visuality. In T. Brennan & M. Jay (Eds.), Vision in Context: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Sight (pp. 63–81). London, New York: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesDebord, G. (1995). The Society of the Spectacle. D. Nicholson-Smith (Trans.). New York: Zone Books.pl
dc.description.referencesDebray, R. (1992). Vie et mort de l’image. Une histoire du regard en Occident. Paris: Gallimard.pl
dc.description.referencesDerrida, J. (2016). Of Grammatology. G.Ch. Spivak (Trans.). Baltimore, London: John Hopkins University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesDescartes, R. (2001). Discourse on Method, Optics, Geometry, and Meteorology. P.J. Olscamp (Trans.). Cambridge, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Companypl
dc.description.referencesDurkheim, É. (2008). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. J.W. Swain (Trans.). Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, Inc.pl
dc.description.referencesFinkelstein, J. (2007). The Art of Self Invention: Image and Identity in Popular Visual Culture. London, New York: I.B. Tauris.pl
dc.description.referencesFoucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. A. Sheridan (Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.pl
dc.description.referencesFoucault, M. (2002). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. G. Owen & J. MacLachlan (Trans.). London, New York: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesFriedberg, A. (2006). The Virtual Window: From Alberti to Microsoft. Cambridge, London, Massachusetts: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.pl
dc.description.referencesGalileo, G. (1957). The Assayer. S. Drake (Trans.). New York: Doubleday, McClure Company.pl
dc.description.referencesHochman, N. & Manovich, L. (2013). Zooming into an Instagram City: Reading the Local Through Social Media. First Monday, 18(7), 1–38. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v18i7.4711.pl
dc.description.referencesJay, M. (1991). The Disenchantment of the Eye: Surrealism and the Crisis of Ocularcentrism. Visual Anthropology Review, 7(1), 15–38. DOI: 10.1525/VAR.1991.7.1.15.pl
dc.description.referencesJay, M. (1994). Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley, London, Los Angeles: University of California Press.pl
dc.description.referencesJay, M. (2013). Forces Fields: Between Intellectual History and Cultural Critique. London, New York: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesJenks, Ch. (1995). The Centrality of the Eye in Western Culture: An Introduction. In Ch. Jenks (Ed.), Visual Culture (pp. 1–25). London, New York: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesJones, A. (2006). Self/Image: Technology, Representation, and the Contemporary Subject. London, New York: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesJones, A. (2012). Seeing Differently: A History and Theory of Identifi cation and the Visual Arts. London, New York: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesŁuczak, D. (2018). Foto-oko. Wizja fotografi czna wobec okularocentryzmu w sztuce I połowy XX wieku. Kraków: Universitas.pl
dc.description.referencesManovich, L. (2013). Software Takes Command. London, New Delhi, New York, Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic.pl
dc.description.referencesManovich, L. (2017). Instagram and Contemporary Image. Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Creative Commons License. Retrieved from http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/instagram-and-contemporary-imagepl
dc.description.referencesManovich, L. (2020). Cultural Analytics. Cambridge. London, Massachusetts: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.pl
dc.description.referencesMcLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, London, Massachusetts: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.pl
dc.description.referencesMetz, Ch. (1982). The Imaginary Signifi er: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema. B. Brewster, C. Britton, A. Guzzetti, A. Williams (Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesMirzoeff N. (2016). How to See the World: An Introduction to Images, form Self-Portraits to Selfi es, from Maps to Movies, and More. New York: Basic Books.pl
dc.description.referencesMitchell, W.J. (1994). The Reconfi gured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post-Photographic Era. Cambridge, London, Massachusetts: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.pl
dc.description.referencesMitchell, W.J.T. (2005). What Do Pictures Want?: The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.pl
dc.description.referencesMitchell, W.J.T. (2011). Cloning Terror: The War of Images, 9/11 The Present. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.pl
dc.description.referencesMitchell, W.J.T. (2012). Seeing Through Race. Cambridge, London, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesNdalianis, A. (2004). Neo-Baroque Aesthetics and Contemporary Entertainment. Cambridge, London, Massachusetts: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.pl
dc.description.referencesPanofsky, E. (1991). Perspective as Symbolic Form. Ch.S. Wood (Trans.). New York: Zone Books.pl
dc.description.referencesPlato, (2008). The Republic. B. Jowett (Trans.). New York: Cosimo, Inc.pl
dc.description.referencesRogowski, Ł. (2014). Technologie uniewidzielniania, czyli o redukcji zakresu kultury wizualnej. In Studia Medioznawcze 2021, tom 22, nr 3 (86), s. 962–994 https://studiamedioznawcze.eu Ł. Rogowski (Ed.), Techno-widzenie. Media i technologie wizualne w społeczeństwie ponowoczesnym (pp. 11–23). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Nauk Społecznych Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniupl
dc.description.referencesRose, G. (2016). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. London, Los Angeles, Melbourne, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, DC: SAGE Publications.pl
dc.description.referencesSchroeder, J.E. (2002). Visual Consumption. London, New York: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesSearle, J.R. (1980). “’Las Meninas’ and the Paradoxes of Pictorial Representation.” Critical Inquiry, 6(3), 477–488. DOI: 10.1086/448060.pl
dc.description.referencesSendyka, R. (2012). Poetyki wizualności. In T. Walas & R. Nycz (Eds.), Kulturowa teoria literatury (Vol. 2: Poetyki, problematyki, interpretacje, pp. 137–184). Kraków: Universitas.pl
dc.description.referencesStawowczyk, E. (2002). O widzeniu, mediach i poznaniu. Stłuczone lustra rzeczywistości. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Fundacji Humaniora.pl
dc.description.referencesSztompka, P. (2005). Socjologia wizualna. Fotografi a jako metoda badawcza. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.pl
dc.description.referencesVirilio, P. (1994). The Vision Machine. J. Rose (Trans.). Bloomington, Indianapolis, London: British Film Institute, Indiana University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesWittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations. G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker, & J. Schulte (Trans.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.pl
dc.description.volume22pl
dc.description.number3(86)pl
dc.description.firstpage962pl
dc.description.lastpage994pl
dc.identifier.citation2Studia Medioznawczepl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7258-1620-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Artykuły naukowe (WSK)

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
K. Chmielecki, The Concept of Ocularcentrism.pdf3 MBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons