REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze
  4. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2021, Vol. 26 nr 1

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/10692
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorTurkina, Anastasia-
    dc.date.accessioned2021-04-15T10:35:07Z-
    dc.date.available2021-04-15T10:35:07Z-
    dc.date.issued2021-
    dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 26 nr 1, 2021, s. 131-140pl
    dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/10692-
    dc.description.abstractIn its recent practice, the Court of Justice of the European Union has held that European Free Trade Association (EFTA) nationals enjoy the same level of protection against extradition to a third state as EU citizens. This article analyses the reasoning of the Court and establishes a link with previous decisions on extradition matters. The author concludes that the test for extradition is still forming and its application lacks clarity and consistency.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherWydział Prawa Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, Temida 2pl
    dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Na tych samych warunkach 3.0 Polska*
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
    dc.subjectExtraditionpl
    dc.subjectEU citizenshippl
    dc.subjectmutual recognitionpl
    dc.titleExtradition of European Union Citizens anywhere except the Russian Federation: The Case of I.Npl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holderUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0);-
    dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2021.26.01.10-
    dc.description.Emailanastasiya.turkina@gmail.compl
    dc.description.BiographicalnoteAnastasia Turkina – PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University (Russia).pl
    dc.description.AffiliationImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Russiapl
    dc.description.referencesAgreement on extradition between the European Union and the United States of America of 25 June 2003 (O.J. 2003 L 181, 19.07.2003).pl
    dc.description.referencesAgreement on the European Economic Area (O.J. L 1, 3.01.1994).pl
    dc.description.referencesBöse M., Mutual recognition, extradition to third countries and Union citizenship: Petruhhin, “Common Market Law Review” 2017, vol. 54, no 6.pl
    dc.description.referencesCosta M. J., The emerging EU extradition Law. Petruhhin and beyond, “New Journal of European Criminal Law” 2017, vol. 8, no 2.pl
    dc.description.referencesCouncil Decision (EU) No 2014/835 of 27 November 2014 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway (O.J. 2014 L 343, 28.11.2014).pl
    dc.description.referencesCouncil Framework Decision (JHA) 2002/584 of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (O.J. L 190, 18.7.2002).pl
    dc.description.referencesCoutts S., From Union citizens to national subjects: Pisciotti, “Common Market Law Review” 2019, vol. 56, no 2.pl
    dc.description.referencesEuropean Convention on Extradition, signed in Paris on 13 December 1957.pl
    dc.description.referencesJudgment of CJEU of 10 April 2018 on the case of Romano Pisciotti v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, C 191/16.pl
    dc.description.referencesJudgment of CJEU of 2 April 2020 on the case of criminal proceedings against I.N., C 897/19 PPU.pl
    dc.description.referencesJudgment of CJEU of 6 September 2016 on the case of proceedings relating to the extradition of Aleksei Petruhhin, C 182/15.pl
    dc.description.referencesOpinion of Advocate General Tanchev of 27 February 2020 on the case Ruska Federacija v I.N., C 897/19 PPU, points 78–79.pl
    dc.description.referencesOrder of CJEU of 6 September 2017 on the case Peter Schotthöfer & Florian Steiner GbR v Eugen Adelsmayr, C 473/15.pl
    dc.description.referencesRegulation (EU) No 604/2013 of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (O.J. L 180, 29.06.2013).pl
    dc.description.referencesДоговор между Российской Федерацией и Латвийской Республикой о правовой помощи и правовых отношениях по гражданским, семейным и уголовным делам от 03.02.1993. (Dogovor miezdu Rossiiskoi Fiedieraciei I Latviiskoi Respublikoi o pravovoi pomoszczi i pravovych otnoszeniach po grazdanskim, siemieinym I ugolovnym dielam ot 03.02.1993).pl
    dc.description.volume26pl
    dc.description.number1pl
    dc.description.firstpage131pl
    dc.description.lastpage140pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4040-9081-
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2021, Vol. 26 nr 1

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    BSP_26_1_A_Turkina_Extradition_of_European_Union_Citizens_anywhere_except_the_Russian_Federation.pdf122,73 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons