Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/6983
Tytuł: | Zakres przedmiotowy i podmiotowy zażalenia w polskim procesie karnym |
Inne tytuły: | Complaint in the Polish criminal proceedings – types of contested decisions and parties entitled to of the remedy |
Autorzy: | Czarnecki, Paweł |
Słowa kluczowe: | appeal measures appellate proceedings complaint right to a fair trial principle of two instances Code of Criminal Procedure środki zaskarżenia postępowanie odwoławcze zażalenie prawo do rzetelnego procesu zasada dwuinstancyjności kodeks postępowania karnego |
Data wydania: | 2018 |
Data dodania: | 2-paź-2018 |
Wydawca: | Temida 2 |
Źródło: | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 23 nr 1, 2018, s. 33-45 |
Abstrakt: | This article concerns procedural decisions that enable a complaint to be brought in criminal proceedings and the parties entitled to initiate this measure. It is worth emphasizing that the principles of appeal proceedings originate both in Polish law, primarily the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, as well as in international agreements such as the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights. According to art. 459 § 1 Code of Criminal Procedure, complaints may be brought against the decisions of a court which preclude the rendering of a judgment, against decisions with respect to a preventive measure, as well as against other decisions in cases prescribed under the Act. The right to file a complaint is vested in the parties and in any other person directly concerned by the decision, unless otherwise provided for in the Act. The article lists the features of the complaint and the indicated decisions to which the complaint applies. It then proceeds to criticize the current applicable provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure in this regard. The article stresses the importance attached to the right to appeal against judgments and decisions made in the first instance, the connection between the complaint and the principle of twoinstances, and the principle of the right to a fair trial. The author concludes by offering six postulates that may serve to improve the procedure initiated by the complaint. |
Afiliacja: | Uniwersytet Jagielloński |
Nota biograficzna: | Paweł Czarnecki – doktor nauk prawnych, adiunkt w Katedrze Postępowania Karnego Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Paweł Czarnecki – Ph.D. in law, lecturer at the Jagiellonian University. |
E-mail: | pawellas@op.pl |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/6983 |
DOI: | 10.15290/bsp.2018.23.01.02 |
ISSN: | 1689-7404 |
Typ Dokumentu: | Article |
Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2018, Vol. 23 nr 1 |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BSP_23_1_P_Czarnecki_Zakres_przedmiotowy_i_podmiotowy_zazalenia.pdf | 145,89 kB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja jest chroniona prawem autorskim (Copyright © Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone)