<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Kolekcja:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/5861</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 21:50:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-06-17T21:50:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>O prawach dziecka uwag kilka na tle książki Błażeja Kmieciaka „Prawa dziecka jako pacjenta” Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2016, stron 292.</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/5883</link>
      <description>Tytu&amp;#322;: O prawach dziecka uwag kilka na tle książki Błażeja Kmieciaka „Prawa dziecka jako pacjenta” Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2016, stron 292.
Autorzy: Bagan-Kurluta, Katarzyna</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/11320/5883</guid>
      <dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Glosa do wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Krakowie z dnia 12 maja 2015 r. (sygn. I ACa 204/15)</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/5882</link>
      <description>Tytu&amp;#322;: Glosa do wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Krakowie z dnia 12 maja 2015 r. (sygn. I ACa 204/15)
Autorzy: Kolada, Jan Leon</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/11320/5882</guid>
      <dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ograniczenia prawa pacjenta do samostanowienia w związku z hospitalizacją w przypadku gruźlicy</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/5881</link>
      <description>Tytu&amp;#322;: Ograniczenia prawa pacjenta do samostanowienia w związku z hospitalizacją w przypadku gruźlicy
Autorzy: Rybarczyk, Katarzyna
Abstrakt: The subject of the article is a discussion of issues related to the limitation of patients’ rights provided for in the law in the prevention and control of infectious diseases - in this instance tuberculosis. The above restrictions result from the treatment of public health as a merit of higher protection than individual human rights. Th ey are manifested in the specifi c responsibilities of patients in the case of tuberculosis, such as forced treatment and hospitalization, and therefore despite the lack of consent or against objection, compliance with the injunctions and prohibitions of the State Sanitary Inspection to prevent and combat infectious diseases. In this article I am presenting legal solutions limiting the patient’s right to decide on treatment, consent or objection to health services related to the implementation of tuberculosis prevention and control tasks, thus limiting the patient’s autonomy in relation to this disease and pointing to problems arising in connection with the fulfillment of obligations in this respect. Keywords: patient’s rights, restriction of patient’s autonomy, tuberculosis, obligatory hospitalization.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/11320/5881</guid>
      <dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Administracyjnoprawne ograniczenia autonomii pacjenta – uwagi wokół przymusu leczenia</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/5880</link>
      <description>Tytu&amp;#322;: Administracyjnoprawne ograniczenia autonomii pacjenta – uwagi wokół przymusu leczenia
Autorzy: Michalak, Krzysztof; Firlus, Jakub Grzegorz
Abstrakt: Public administration operates under a wide variety of legal forms and regulates a broad range of the citizenries day-to-day activities. Amongst the many subjects of state interest, vital for the self-determination of individuals, is that of disease surveillance which is conducted by specialized organs of state – the so-called ‘administrative police’. Under the competences of epidemic intelligence, public authorities may intervene in the scope of patient autonomy, for example by imposing compulsory vaccination. However, the standards of procedure involved are questionable insofar that they represent little more than an adjudicative, ‘court-room’ style, adversarial process of decision-making. This seems to lessen the right to fair administrative justice and as such may be recognized as being unconstitutional. This is to say that administra-tive proceedings are not coherent with the essence of patient autonomy doctrine (concept). In this study the authors address several issues connected both with the legal framework of pro-ceedings before the ‘administrative police’ and judicial review of public authorities’ actions which are affecting the individual’s right to self-determination.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/11320/5880</guid>
      <dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

