DSpace Kolekcja:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/6775
2024-03-29T14:42:39ZKonferencja „Prawne i ekonomiczne aspekty rynku nieruchomości rolnych w Polsce. Stan i potrzeby zmian”, Olsztyn 2 grudnia 2016 r.
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/6797
Tytuł: Konferencja „Prawne i ekonomiczne aspekty rynku nieruchomości rolnych w Polsce. Stan i potrzeby zmian”, Olsztyn 2 grudnia 2016 r.
Autorzy: Hejbudzki, Michał2017-01-01T00:00:00ZGLOSA do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 22 czerwca 2017 r., III CZP 24/17
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/6796
Tytuł: GLOSA do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 22 czerwca 2017 r., III CZP 24/17
Autorzy: Bieluk, Magdalena
Abstrakt: Article 2b of the Act on Formation of the Agricultural System of 11 April 2003 is the source of a wide range of interpretation discrepancies and practical problems. In the commented on resolution, the Supreme Court settled the issue of the sale of agricultural property by the buyer before the end of the period provided for in art. 2b para. 1 of the Act to a close person within the meaning of art. 2 point 6 of the Act, indicating that it does not require the consent of the court issued on the basis of art. 2b para. 3 of this Act. The position of the Supreme Court deserves approval. The solutions introduced so far are sufficient in the prevention of speculative risk and the restrictive interpretation of this provision would be disproportionate to the intended purpose. The resolution of the above-mentioned issue by the Supreme Court should be positively assessed, however, the wording of art. 2b of the Act is still a source of many interpretative difficulties that need to be resolved. This applies, for example, to the insufficiently clear drafting of art. 2b para. 1, an unclear interpretation of art. 2b para. 3 and the narrowed circle of close persons in the definition contained in art. 2 para. 6.2017-01-01T00:00:00ZO nabyciu nieruchomości rolnej przez osobę bliską zbywcy. Uwagi na kanwie uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 22 czerwca 2017 r., III CZP 24/17
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/6795
Tytuł: O nabyciu nieruchomości rolnej przez osobę bliską zbywcy. Uwagi na kanwie uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 22 czerwca 2017 r., III CZP 24/17
Autorzy: Michałowski, Rafał
Abstrakt: Provisions of the Polish Act on Shaping of the Agricultural System pose a number of doubts as to their interpretation. In its resolution adopted on 22 June 2017, the Supreme Court decided that an owner of an agricultural property, to whom the 10-year trading prohibition applies, as referred to in Art. 2b par. 2 of the Act, is allowed to trade it within that period for the benefit of a closely related person. This opinion raises doubts, as it has no legitimate authorisation in the legal provisions. Furthermore, the functional arguments put forward by the Supreme Court do not provide sufficient justification for the above-mentioned conclusion. In the author’s opinion, a number of problems emerging from Art. 2b of the Act on Shaping the Agricultural System could be solved through a functional, flexible interpretation of the prerequisite of “material reasons, irrespective of the buyer”, which underlies the court’s consent to the disposal of the real property by an owner burdened by trading prohibition.2017-01-01T00:00:00ZPojęcie nieruchomości rolnej w kodeksie cywilnym i przepisach szczególnych
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/6794
Tytuł: Pojęcie nieruchomości rolnej w kodeksie cywilnym i przepisach szczególnych
Autorzy: Stańko, Marek
Abstrakt: The legal structure of agricultural property has been the subject of discussion in the doctrine of agricultural law and the matter of numerous court decisions. This issue, however, still raises a lot of controversies. The problem occurs in the Civil Code regulation itself (art. 461 of the Civil Code), in which the concepts of agricultural real estate and agricultural land were wrongly identified. It should be clearly indicated that only agricultural property is a category of ownership, while this attribute does not refer to the notion of agricultural land. It should also be noted that there is no criterion of area in the Code definition of agricultural real estate. From such a perspective, it is difficult to reconcile the possibility of conducting manufacturing activity in agriculture with the use of any agricultural property regardless of its area. Besides, the weakness of the spatial planning system makes the determination of the nature of property, in particular when it loses its agricultural character, a very complicated process. Despite the mentioned shortcomings of the legal regulation, the Code definition of agricultural property should be universal and common. However, modifications of this definition introduced in specific provisions make use of multiple regulations dysfunctional.2017-01-01T00:00:00Z