<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3665">
    <title>DSpace Kolekcja:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3665</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3715" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3713" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3716" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3714" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-06-01T07:39:52Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3715">
    <title>Topological Manifolds</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3715</link>
    <description>Tytu&amp;#322;: Topological Manifolds
Autorzy: Pąk, Karol
Abstrakt: Let us recall that a topological space M is a topological manifold if M is second-countable Hausdorff and locally Euclidean, i.e. each point has a neighborhood that is homeomorphic to an open ball of E n for some n. However, if we would like to consider a topological manifold with a boundary, we have to extend this definition. Therefore, we introduce here the concept of a locally Euclidean space that covers both cases (with and without a boundary), i.e. where each point has a neighborhood that is homeomorphic to a closed ball of En for some n.&#xD;
&#xD;
Our purpose is to prove, using the Mizar formalism, a number of properties of such locally Euclidean spaces and use them to demonstrate basic properties of a manifold. Let T be a locally Euclidean space. We prove that every interior point of T has a neighborhood homeomorphic to an open ball and that every boundary point of T has a neighborhood homeomorphic to a closed ball, where additionally this point is transformed into a point of the boundary of this ball. When T is n-dimensional, i.e. each point of T has a neighborhood that is homeomorphic to a closed ball of En, we show that the interior of T is a locally Euclidean space without boundary of dimension n and the boundary of T is a locally Euclidean space without boundary of dimension n − 1. Additionally, we show that every connected component of a compact locally Euclidean space is a locally Euclidean space of some dimension. We prove also that the Cartesian product of locally Euclidean spaces also forms a locally Euclidean space. We determine the interior and boundary of this product and show that its dimension is the sum of the dimensions of its factors. At the end, we present several consequences of these results for topological manifolds. This article is based on [14].</description>
    <dc:date>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3713">
    <title>Tarski Geometry Axioms</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3713</link>
    <description>Tytu&amp;#322;: Tarski Geometry Axioms
Autorzy: Richter, William; Grabowski, Adam; Alama, Jesse
Abstrakt: This is the translation of the Mizar article containing readable Mizar proofs of some axiomatic geometry theorems formulated by the great Polish mathematician Alfred Tarski [8], and we hope to continue this work.&#xD;
&#xD;
The article is an extension and upgrading of the source code written by the first author with the help of miz3 tool; his primary goal was to use proof checkers to help teach rigorous axiomatic geometry in high school using Hilbert’s axioms.&#xD;
&#xD;
This is largely a Mizar port of Julien Narboux’s Coq pseudo-code [6]. We partially prove the theorem of [7] that Tarski’s (extremely weak!) plane geometry axioms imply Hilbert’s axioms. Specifically, we obtain Gupta’s amazing proof which implies Hilbert’s axiom I1 that two points determine a line.&#xD;
&#xD;
The primary Mizar coding was heavily influenced by [9] on axioms of incidence geometry. The original development was much improved using Mizar adjectives instead of predicates only, and to use this machinery in full extent, we have to construct some models of Tarski geometry. These are listed in the second section, together with appropriate registrations of clusters. Also models of Tarski’s geometry related to real planes were constructed.</description>
    <dc:date>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3716">
    <title>Preface</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3716</link>
    <description>Tytu&amp;#322;: Preface
Autorzy: Grabowski, Adam; Shidama, Yasunari</description>
    <dc:date>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3714">
    <title>A Note on the Seven Bridges of Königsberg Problem</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3714</link>
    <description>Tytu&amp;#322;: A Note on the Seven Bridges of Königsberg Problem
Autorzy: Naumowicz, Adam
Abstrakt: In this paper we account for the formalization of the seven bridges of Königsberg puzzle. The problem originally posed and solved by Euler in 1735 is historically notable for having laid the foundations of graph theory, cf. [7]. Our formalization utilizes a simple set-theoretical graph representation with four distinct sets for the graph’s vertices and another seven sets that represent the edges (bridges). The work appends the article by Nakamura and Rudnicki [10] by introducing the classic example of a graph that does not contain an Eulerian path.&#xD;
&#xD;
This theorem is item #54 from the “Formalizing 100 Theorems” list maintained by Freek Wiedijk at http://www.cs.ru.nl/F.Wiedijk/100/.</description>
    <dc:date>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

