<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19807">
    <title>DSpace Kolekcja:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19807</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19849" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19846" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19844" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19842" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-06-01T17:25:06Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19849">
    <title>The Status of the Social in Creativity Studies and the Pitfalls of Dichotomic Thinking</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19849</link>
    <description>Tytu&amp;#322;: The Status of the Social in Creativity Studies and the Pitfalls of Dichotomic Thinking
Autorzy: Glăveanu, Vlad Petre
Abstrakt: Creativity studies seem to be a stronghold for individualbased psychological theories. The reasons for this are numerous and complex and, among them, we can identify certain limited or counter-productive ways of conceptualising the social. In this reply to comments I address both the status of the social in creativity studies and the dichotomies that follow from adopting an external view of society and culture. Among them, the separation between creative potential and achievement is particularly problematic, as it constructs a reified, static, and individual notion of potential, reflected in the measurement of divergent thinking. I propose, towards the end, a perspectival model of creativity that radically socialises divergent thinking by placing the social at the core rather than the periphery of creative production. Finally, I suggest that including time into our theory and research holds the key to overcoming many of the false dichotomies that underline creativity studies, at least in psychology. A thoroughly social perspective on creativity might seem like a daring or foolish endeavour but it is, in my view, also the most promising.</description>
    <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19846">
    <title>„And What is a Beautiful Poem”? Reflections of a Poet on Vlad Petre Glăveanu’s The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19846</link>
    <description>Tytu&amp;#322;: „And What is a Beautiful Poem”? Reflections of a Poet on Vlad Petre Glăveanu’s The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading
Autorzy: Citko, Katarzyna
Abstrakt: I fully subscribe to Glăveanu’s opinions. I am not a psychologist, but as someone who specialises in culture and at the same time, as a poet, I believe that if the psychology of creativity is to say something truthful about the creative process, it should open up to the inner life of artists and to statistically unmeasurable processes such as talent and inspiration, rather than devise and carry out laboratory experiments. Therefore, encouraged by Glăveanu to pose innovative questions, in my article I ask about the essence of poetic inspiration, that is able to create images and lies at the root of metaphor which emerges in the mind of an artist.</description>
    <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19844">
    <title>The Big Question in Creativity Research: The Transcendental Source of Creativity</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19844</link>
    <description>Tytu&amp;#322;: The Big Question in Creativity Research: The Transcendental Source of Creativity
Autorzy: Kharkhurin, Anatoliy V.
Abstrakt: In this commentary, I raise an etiological question, which has been virtually excluded from the horizon of contemporary scholarship. In spite of a long history of philosophical, mystical, and religious approaches considering the transcendent and/or spiritual sources of human creativity, mainstream creativity researchers have become gradually reluctant to acknowledge the supernatural influences in this human endeavour. This account is either disregarded altogether or re-interpreted in a way that substitutes supernatural connections with observable and measurable processes. On the one hand, the latter approach appears to fall within the premises of modern science and thereby earns substantial attention the scientific community. On the other, this could be one of the reasons why creativity research has reached its epistemological cul-de-sac. I argue that by retaining the source of creativity within an individual, one annihilates the whole constellation of personality traits and processes, which have transcendent characteristics. It is important to integrate the study of transcendent experience into the study of cognitive, personality, and environmental underpinnings of creative faculties. A possible direction for this change is offered by transpersonal psychology, which makes an attempt to resurrect an investigation of spiritual reality and integrate it in the study of modern psychology. At the end of the commentary, I sketch a transcendental model of creativity developed along the lines of a transpersonal paradigm.</description>
    <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19842">
    <title>Knowing Creativity. Commentary on Glăveanu, V. (2014). The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19842</link>
    <description>Tytu&amp;#322;: Knowing Creativity. Commentary on Glăveanu, V. (2014). The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading
Autorzy: Tan, Ai-Girl
Abstrakt: In this commentary an indispensable aspect of creativity, knowing creativity, is articulated as a response to Glăveanu’s (2014) inquiry into advancement of the field of the psychology of creativity. Connotations of knowing are presented such as perceiving and understanding ourselves within our environment. Accordingly, knowing creativity is about genuinely seeing, sensing, feeling, and relating creativity for self and the common good.</description>
    <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

