<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Kolekcja:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9284" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9284</id>
  <updated>2026-06-01T13:24:40Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-06-01T13:24:40Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Kinga Bączyk-Rozwadowska, Prokreacja medycznie wspomagana. Studium z dziedziny prawa, Wydawnictwo TNOiK – Dom Organizatora, Toruń 2018, ss. 807</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9303" />
    <author>
      <name>Bagińska, Ewa</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9303</id>
    <updated>2020-07-07T07:54:37Z</updated>
    <published>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Tytu&amp;#322;: Kinga Bączyk-Rozwadowska, Prokreacja medycznie wspomagana. Studium z dziedziny prawa, Wydawnictwo TNOiK – Dom Organizatora, Toruń 2018, ss. 807
Autorzy: Bagińska, Ewa</summary>
    <dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Glosa do wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Krakowie z dnia 3 września 2015 r. (I ACa 679/15)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9302" />
    <author>
      <name>Góralczyk, Karolina</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9302</id>
    <updated>2020-07-07T07:42:34Z</updated>
    <published>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Tytu&amp;#322;: Glosa do wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Krakowie z dnia 3 września 2015 r. (I ACa 679/15)
Autorzy: Góralczyk, Karolina</summary>
    <dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Obowiązek udzielenia informacji prasie a tajemnica medyczna</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9301" />
    <author>
      <name>Cekała, Aleksandra</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Nowak, Artur</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9301</id>
    <updated>2020-07-07T07:19:59Z</updated>
    <published>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Tytu&amp;#322;: Obowiązek udzielenia informacji prasie a tajemnica medyczna
Autorzy: Cekała, Aleksandra; Nowak, Artur
Abstrakt: Medical confidentiality is a legally regulated principle of professional ethics, which not only protects patients from the disclosure of their confidential data, but also constitutes limitations on the possibility of transferring information between healthcare providers and the press. This article has two main objectives. To show the impact of medical confidentiality on journalistic activities, in particular on the procedure of providing information to the press as part of a press inquiry. The second goal is to display to both sides of the conflict of interest certain patterns of correct behaviour, and their rights and duties towards not only each other, but also the patient.</summary>
    <dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Tajemnica medyczna a prawo osoby bliskiej pacjenta do informacji medycznej – przyczynek do dyskusji</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9299" />
    <author>
      <name>Jabłońska, Marta</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9299</id>
    <updated>2020-07-06T12:34:29Z</updated>
    <published>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Tytu&amp;#322;: Tajemnica medyczna a prawo osoby bliskiej pacjenta do informacji medycznej – przyczynek do dyskusji
Autorzy: Jabłońska, Marta
Abstrakt: The purpose of this article is to attempt to present the institution of medical law, which is medical confidentiality, to define it, to highlight the most important features, and then to contrast it with the right to medical information of a relative of a patient, as a law competing with the need to maintain medical confidentiality. The work begins with a description of the right to privacy as a source of medical confidentiality. Then, an attempt is made to determine the subjective and objective scope of confidentiality obligations imposed on entities providing medical services, while indicating the situations in which this obligation is lifted. Medical secrecy is presented as the obligation of medical personnel reflecting the patient’s right to information, with particular emphasis on the right to access medical records. The thesis was made that the patient is the only holder of information about him/her who has the right to voluntarily extend this right to other entities by authorization. In opposition, specific legal norms have been articulated for these considerations, which give the right to medical information on the patient’s state of health to those close to him/her, without the consent or knowledge of the person concerned. Particular attention is paid to the regulations regarding the application of medical confidentiality after the patient’s death. In the course of the argument, doubts related to the correctness of introducing the discussed provisions into the Polish legal system are indicated.</summary>
    <dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

