<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Kolekcja:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3467" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3467</id>
  <updated>2026-06-01T14:21:02Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-06-01T14:21:02Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Indeks osobowy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3504" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3504</id>
    <updated>2016-01-06T02:03:10Z</updated>
    <published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Tytu&amp;#322;: Indeks osobowy</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Indeks tematyczny</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3503" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3503</id>
    <updated>2016-01-06T02:03:11Z</updated>
    <published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Tytu&amp;#322;: Indeks tematyczny</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Antropologia Benedykta XVI na tle błędnych antropologii współczesnych</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3502" />
    <author>
      <name>Warzeszak, Józef</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3502</id>
    <updated>2017-10-05T22:54:18Z</updated>
    <published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Tytu&amp;#322;: Antropologia Benedykta XVI na tle błędnych antropologii współczesnych
Autorzy: Warzeszak, Józef
Abstrakt: Pope Benedict XVI in his speeches spoke up in weighty matters for humanity.&#xD;
Definitely presented the Catholic position and pointed out mistakes of false&#xD;
ideologies, especially concerning human being, his nature, vocation, the sense&#xD;
of life and conduct. Most of all he indicated the pernicious influence of such&#xD;
ideology on the conduct of man and society.&#xD;
The chief defect of ideologies spread around today and at the same time&#xD;
their common denominator – according to the Pope – is the denial of the&#xD;
transcendent dimension of man, and even directly combating of what is the&#xD;
subject of a formal theological anthropology, that means the man’s relation&#xD;
with God. At the same time, the characteristic of theses ideologies is the fact&#xD;
that they want to be universal and want to form social life.&#xD;
In this article, the author discusses these ideologies and shows what is contrary&#xD;
in them to the theological anthropology. The author also presents the&#xD;
characteristics of anthropology of Joseph Ratzinger – Benedict XVI as dialogical,&#xD;
relational, communional and integral.</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Byt ludzki w kontekście współczesnego sporu o rozumienie natury i kultury człowieka</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3501" />
    <author>
      <name>Sienkiewicz, Edward</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3501</id>
    <updated>2017-10-05T22:54:18Z</updated>
    <published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Tytu&amp;#322;: Byt ludzki w kontekście współczesnego sporu o rozumienie natury i kultury człowieka
Autorzy: Sienkiewicz, Edward
Abstrakt: Modern dispute about the understanding of culture and nature is rich in&#xD;
tradition and dates back to ancient Greek sophists. However, in the modern&#xD;
era we observe a radicalization of positions. This is caused by superficial&#xD;
understanding of both the nature and culture, what matters is the narrow&#xD;
empiricism or extreme idealism. In addition, there is the absence of a human&#xD;
problem in this dispute, which is supported by anthropology practiced today&#xD;
within the framework of specialized and narrow detailed disciplines without&#xD;
the possibility of synthesis. An off er to solve this dispute, having sometimes&#xD;
the nature of the conflict, is a subjective nature of culture, allowing to reconcile&#xD;
man’s relationship with nature and everything that cannot be brought only&#xD;
to this dimension. The best evidence of this solution proves to be a Christian&#xD;
personalism, which does not overlook any of the essential dimensions of human&#xD;
existence. Besides the complex structure of the human being - what best&#xD;
describes the concept of a person – it applies both to the material and the&#xD;
spiritual world, providing thus a foundation in resolving the dispute over the&#xD;
understanding of culture and human nature. The ultimate criterion remains the&#xD;
event of the Incarnation, which is appropriate to claim an objective criterion of&#xD;
reality - “I am the truth” (Jn 14,6), shedding light on the human understanding;&#xD;
his secret and mystery. The value of culture is evaluated from the point of view of the objective truth, which also remains a key reference within the meaning&#xD;
of nature and its relationship to human activity.</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

