DSpace Kolekcja:http://hdl.handle.net/11320/34672024-03-29T06:55:33Z2024-03-29T06:55:33ZIndeks osobowyhttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/35042016-01-06T02:03:10Z2015-01-01T00:00:00ZTytuł: Indeks osobowy2015-01-01T00:00:00ZIndeks tematycznyhttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/35032016-01-06T02:03:11Z2015-01-01T00:00:00ZTytuł: Indeks tematyczny2015-01-01T00:00:00ZAntropologia Benedykta XVI na tle błędnych antropologii współczesnychWarzeszak, Józefhttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/35022017-10-05T22:54:18Z2015-01-01T00:00:00ZTytuł: Antropologia Benedykta XVI na tle błędnych antropologii współczesnych
Autorzy: Warzeszak, Józef
Abstrakt: Pope Benedict XVI in his speeches spoke up in weighty matters for humanity.
Definitely presented the Catholic position and pointed out mistakes of false
ideologies, especially concerning human being, his nature, vocation, the sense
of life and conduct. Most of all he indicated the pernicious influence of such
ideology on the conduct of man and society.
The chief defect of ideologies spread around today and at the same time
their common denominator – according to the Pope – is the denial of the
transcendent dimension of man, and even directly combating of what is the
subject of a formal theological anthropology, that means the man’s relation
with God. At the same time, the characteristic of theses ideologies is the fact
that they want to be universal and want to form social life.
In this article, the author discusses these ideologies and shows what is contrary
in them to the theological anthropology. The author also presents the
characteristics of anthropology of Joseph Ratzinger – Benedict XVI as dialogical,
relational, communional and integral.2015-01-01T00:00:00ZByt ludzki w kontekście współczesnego sporu o rozumienie natury i kultury człowiekaSienkiewicz, Edwardhttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/35012017-10-05T22:54:18Z2015-01-01T00:00:00ZTytuł: Byt ludzki w kontekście współczesnego sporu o rozumienie natury i kultury człowieka
Autorzy: Sienkiewicz, Edward
Abstrakt: Modern dispute about the understanding of culture and nature is rich in
tradition and dates back to ancient Greek sophists. However, in the modern
era we observe a radicalization of positions. This is caused by superficial
understanding of both the nature and culture, what matters is the narrow
empiricism or extreme idealism. In addition, there is the absence of a human
problem in this dispute, which is supported by anthropology practiced today
within the framework of specialized and narrow detailed disciplines without
the possibility of synthesis. An off er to solve this dispute, having sometimes
the nature of the conflict, is a subjective nature of culture, allowing to reconcile
man’s relationship with nature and everything that cannot be brought only
to this dimension. The best evidence of this solution proves to be a Christian
personalism, which does not overlook any of the essential dimensions of human
existence. Besides the complex structure of the human being - what best
describes the concept of a person – it applies both to the material and the
spiritual world, providing thus a foundation in resolving the dispute over the
understanding of culture and human nature. The ultimate criterion remains the
event of the Incarnation, which is appropriate to claim an objective criterion of
reality - “I am the truth” (Jn 14,6), shedding light on the human understanding;
his secret and mystery. The value of culture is evaluated from the point of view of the objective truth, which also remains a key reference within the meaning
of nature and its relationship to human activity.2015-01-01T00:00:00Z