http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19320 2026-06-01T15:15:41Z 2026-06-01T15:15:41Z Szanciło, Tomasz http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19352 2025-12-01T11:10:09Z 2025-01-01T00:00:00Z

Tytuł: Jawność postępowania gospodarczego a elektronizacja procesu cywilnego Autorzy: Szanciło, Tomasz Abstrakt: The principle of openness is a guiding principle of the organisation of justice; the right to an open hearing of a case, inter alia a civil case, is a human right, although not an absolute one. Therefore the digitisation of the civil process should not affect this right. All forms of digitisation are in practice really concerned with the technical and not the substantive aspects of the proceedings. Technical innovations aimed at improving the civil process should be introduced primarily in commercial cases; in the digital age, this does not infringe on the right to a court. Before attempting to apply artificial intelligence to the adjudication of court cases (if that is really possible), it would be advisable first to completely digitise the civil process, especially commercial proceeding.

2025-01-01T00:00:00Z Augustyniak, Łukasz Bernaczyk, Michał Kaczmarek-Templin, Berenika http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19350 2025-12-01T09:57:01Z 2025-01-01T00:00:00Z

Tytuł: Unseen Influence: Computational Propaganda, Free Elections, and the Reluctance to Seek Judicial Remedies in Poland. Evidence from AI-Assisted Case Law Analysis Autorzy: Augustyniak, Łukasz; Bernaczyk, Michał; Kaczmarek-Templin, Berenika Abstrakt: The Polish electoral system adheres to the principle of free and fair elections. This principle has a defined content, and its backbone remains access to truthful information and the free shaping of opinions about a candidate or an issue put to a referendum. However, the enormous increase in computational power and the associated development of artificial intelligence have caused electoral competition to become highly aggressive; it no longer avoids false information, messages appealing to negative emotions, or calls for violence. Very Large Online Platforms’ predictable abdication of their role as moderators of public debate leads to the question: How can or should public authorities protect integrity and freedom of participation from abuse in the era of digital constitutionalism? Should we rely on a litigation system where the initiative comes solely from the participant in the electoral process, or should we also include the regulatory power of the electoral administration? What picture of electoral campaigns is provided by Polish jurisprudence concerning electoral disputes?

2025-01-01T00:00:00Z Kursa, Sławomir Patrycjusz http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19344 2025-11-28T11:10:30Z 2025-01-01T00:00:00Z

Tytuł: The Right to (Not) Make an Electronic Will: The Case of Nevada Autorzy: Kursa, Sławomir Patrycjusz Abstrakt: In 2001, the US state of Nevada became the first in the world to issue regulations directly introducing electronic wills into the legal system. This article provides a brief historical overview of this regulation, as well as the practice of preparing them (or rather the lack thereof) for many years after their introduction. In July 2019, the Uniform Law Commission (Electronic Wills Committee) completed work on the framework for the Uniform Electronic Wills Act, which can be easily adopted by all states. This Act covers the basic regulations necessary for preparing electronic wills, omitting the more controversial and extensive ones found in the Nevada Revised Statutes and leaving states free to choose some of the proposed solutions. The approval of the Uniform Electronic Wills Act and the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated isolation undoubtedly contributed to the increased interest of state legislatures in electronic wills, as well as the acceleration of work on related legislation. The pos sibility of witnesses participating in the preparation of a will without being personally present but rather using remote attestation using audiovisual communication turned out to be particularly attractive. The list of states explicitly regulating the form of electronic wills has begun to grow, and at the same time, mentions of the first electronic wills being prepared have begun to appear.

2025-01-01T00:00:00Z Wojtkiewicz, Katarzyna Barbara http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19342 2025-11-28T10:37:32Z 2025-01-01T00:00:00Z

Tytuł: The Legal Entity Identifier and Legacy Systems: Harmonisation, Interoperability, and Balance in Digital Governance Autorzy: Wojtkiewicz, Katarzyna Barbara Abstrakt: This article examines the Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) as a cornerstone of contemporary digitalised governance. Originally introduced in response to the 2008 financial crisis to address systemic opacity in financial markets, the LEI has since evolved into a global public-good infrastructure that enables interoperability, transparency, and accountability across jurisdictions and sectors. This study investigates the extent to which the LEI can be effectively implemented in Poland and the European Union, and what legal, institutional, and economic barriers constrain its universal adoption. The research employs a multi-method design, combining doctrinal and comparative analysis with empirical evidence from European supervisory projects (the EIOPA, ESMA, ECB, and EBA) and a Polish case study conducted under an NCN project on tax administration. Findings confirm that the LEI strengthens systemic risk monitoring, audit quality, and SME participation in global trade, but also reveal persistent barriers, including renewal costs, administrative burdens, and fragmented domestic identifiers. The analysis identifies four pillars of reform – universality, interoperability, continuity, and public co-financing – necessary to embed the LEI within governance systems. Comparative lessons from the United States and Japan demonstrate that statutory identifiers can extend beyond finance and support innovation while oversight is maintained. The article concludes that only by recognising the LEI as a structural component of digitalised governance can its transformative potential for transparent, resilient, and inclusive public administration be fully realised.

2025-01-01T00:00:00Z