<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Kolekcja:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/13577" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/13577</id>
  <updated>2026-06-01T18:28:21Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-06-01T18:28:21Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Finansowe aspekty funkcjonowania instytutów badawczych nadzorowanych przez Ministra Zdrowia</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/13592" />
    <author>
      <name>Jaworzyńska, Magdalena</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Śmiechowicz, Joanna</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/13592</id>
    <updated>2022-07-20T09:03:27Z</updated>
    <published>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Tytu&amp;#322;: Finansowe aspekty funkcjonowania instytutów badawczych nadzorowanych przez Ministra Zdrowia
Autorzy: Jaworzyńska, Magdalena; Śmiechowicz, Joanna
Abstrakt: Cel – Niniejszy  artykuł  poświęcono  instytutom  badawczym  nadzorowanym  przez  Ministra  Zdrowia, a jego celem jest analiza i ocena oraz porównanie sytuacji finansowej 11 funkcjonujących w Polsce podmiotów w kontekście dalszych możliwości funkcjonowania i zdolności do wykonywania zadań, dla których je powołano.  Metoda badań – Oceny  sytuacji  finansowej  instytutów  badawczych  nadzorowanych  przez  Ministra Zdrowia  dokonano,  opierając się  na  analizie  bilansu, analizie  zysków  i  strat,  analizie  wskaźników  rentowności,  płynności,  efektywności  i  zadłużenia.  W  opracowaniu  posłużono  się  danymi  zawartymi w sprawozdaniach  finansowych  instytutów  badawczych  zamieszczanych  na  stronach  internetowych  Ministerstwa Zdrowia za lata 2017–2020.  Wnioski –  Sytuacja  finansowa  poszczególnych  instytutów  badawczych  jest  mocno  zróżnicowana, ale generalnie w większości przypadków jest ona zła lub wręcz fatalna. Nie sprzyja to realizacji podstawowego  celu,  dla  którego  są  one  tworzone,  tj.  prowadzeniu  badań  i  prac  rozwojowych  oraz  ich wdrażaniu. W dłuższym czasie zagraża to wręcz ich istnieniu w obecnej formie organizacyjnej. Oryginalność /wartość /implikacje /rekomendacje – Podjęta w opracowaniu tematyka, choć jest niezwykle ważna i aktualna, nie stanowi obszaru zainteresowań badaczy. Przeprowadzone w nim analizy i sformułowane wnioski wypełniają w pewnym stopniu istniejącą lukę i stanowią przyczynek do dalszych rozważań.; Purpose – This article is devoted to research institutes supervised by the Minister of Health, and its purpose is to analyze, evaluate and compare the financial situation of 11 entities operating in Poland in the  context  of  further  possibilities  of  functioning  and  the  ability  to perform the  tasks  for  which  they were established. Research method – The financial standing of research institutes supervised by the Minister of Health was assessed based on the balance sheet analysis, profit and loss analysis, analysis of profitability, cash flow,  efficiency  and  debt  ratios.  The  study  used  data  contained  in  financial  statements  of  research institutes posted on the websites of the Ministry of Health for 2017–2020. Results – The  financial condition  of individual research  institutes is  highly varied,  but  generally in most cases it is bad or even critical. It is not favourable situation to fulfil the basic goal for which they are  created,  which  is  research  and  development  works  as  well  as  their  implementation.  In  the  long period of time, it even threatens their existence in the present organizational form. Originality /value /implications /recommendations – The  subject  discussed  in  the  study  is  rarely  in  the area of interest of researchers, although it is extremely important and up-to-date. The analyses carried out  and  the  conclusions  formulated  in  this  article  fill  the  existing  gap  to  some  extent  and  constitute a contribution to further considerations.</summary>
    <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Polish Deal’s changes to the tax system versus the compatibility of fiscal policy goals</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/13591" />
    <author>
      <name>Guziejewska, Beata</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Witczak, Izabela</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/13591</id>
    <updated>2022-07-20T09:02:44Z</updated>
    <published>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Tytu&amp;#322;: The Polish Deal’s changes to the tax system versus the compatibility of fiscal policy goals
Autorzy: Guziejewska, Beata; Witczak, Izabela
Abstrakt: Purpose – An evaluation of changes in the Polish tax system resulting from the governmental prog-ramme called the Polish Deal and an analysis of their consequences for taxpayers with respect to the objectives of a rational and coherent tax system. Research method – A critical analysis of the pertinent literature and tax laws. Conclusions are formu-lated using a deductive method drawing on the achievements of tax theory and the analysis of tax laws. Results – The tax system changes contained in the Polish Deal do not constitute a full-scale reform of the tax system. They were hastily introduced without a thorough analysis of their economic, finan-cial and social consequences. It is disputable whether they will make the tax system fairer as intended and  their  effects  will  only  be  known  in  the  future. Also,  they  do  not  ensure  compatibility  between direct and indirect taxes and do not support the stability of the tax system. Originality/value/implications/recommendations – Tax  system  changes  that  are  ill-conceived  and  disre-gard  the  redistributive  function  of  taxes  may  have  consequences  other  than  expected.  The  main  out-come  of  a  tax  system  revision  should  be  the  compatibility  between  all  fiscal  policy  goals  rather  than between some of its elements and the stability and transparency of tax laws.
Opis: This article was financed by the KFP under its statutory activity.</summary>
    <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Trends in payment intermediation – global perspective of the role of banks and non-banks</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/13587" />
    <author>
      <name>Iwańczuk-Kaliska, Anna</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/13587</id>
    <updated>2022-07-20T09:02:07Z</updated>
    <published>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Tytu&amp;#322;: Trends in payment intermediation – global perspective of the role of banks and non-banks
Autorzy: Iwańczuk-Kaliska, Anna
Abstrakt: Purpose – The  aim  of  the  paper  is  to  assess  the  role  of  banks  and  non-banks  in  payments  from a global  perspective  using  a  comprehensive  approach.  The  considerations  are  also  focused  on  the determinants of possible changes in this area in the future.Research method – The research  methods  applied  in  the  study include the  literature  review  and  the critical analysis of available empirical research results in the field of payment intermediation. The analy-sis based on desk research is focused on changes in payments trends observed worldwide. Results – The research leads to the conclusion that despite the significant role of nonbank entities on the payment services market, banks continue to be important elements of payment systems. There are  no  commonly used solutions  that  are  fully separate  from  banking  systems,  and  there is  no doubt that this will not change in the nearest future. However, payment innovations combined with changes in regulations and central bank strategies may alter the use of both bank money and the banking infra-structure in payments.Originality /value / implications /recommendations – The paper contributes to the discussion on trends leading to a change in the role of banks and an increasing role of non-banks in payment intermediation. It investigates the problem from a global perspective and using a comprehensive approach. Its novelty lies also in the approach based on four distinguished stages of the change of the banks’ role in paymentsystems</summary>
    <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sustainable development of manufacturing enterprises in the socio-economic context. The case of Poland and Germany</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/13586" />
    <author>
      <name>Misztal, Anna</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/13586</id>
    <updated>2022-07-20T09:01:22Z</updated>
    <published>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Tytu&amp;#322;: Sustainable development of manufacturing enterprises in the socio-economic context. The case of Poland and Germany
Autorzy: Misztal, Anna
Abstrakt: Purpose  – The  article  aims  to  assess  the  impact  of  contemporary  external  socio-economic  deter-minants, including globalization, eco-innovation, social development, and macroeconomic stabilization, on  the  sustainable  development  of  manufacturing  enterprises  in  Poland  and  Germany  from  2008  to 2020. Research method – This paper is empirical. The survey covers the manufacturing enterprises in Poland and  Germany.  The  first  part  discusses  the  conceptual background  related  to  the  sustainable  deve-lopment of enterprises in a socio-economic context. The empirical part includes the methodology and results  of  the  study.  To  determine  the  relationship between  socio-economic  factors  and  sustainable development,  the  author  uses  the  Least  Square  Method (OLS)  and  Seemingly  Unrelated  Regression (SUR). Results – The research results show a statistically significant relationship between the variables. Socio-economic  indicators  are  vital  determinants  of  the  sustainable  development  of  manufacturing  enter-prises. The models show that the impact of individual exogenous determinants is different in Poland and Germany. Originality/value/implications/recommendations – The statistical assessment of the socio-economic impact on  enterprises’  sustainable  development  is  relatively  poorly  understood.  The  issue  is  new,  contem-porary  and  requires  further  analysis.  The  exogenous socio-economic  factors  are  important  for  enter-prises sustainable development. It is important to launch macroeconomic efforts to implement sustain-able  development  goals.  The  results  show  a  different impact  of  socio-economic  indicators  on  the sustainable development of manufacturing enterprises, which may indicate that the enterprise develop-ment depends on many factors that are different in analysed countries.</summary>
    <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

