<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Kolekcja:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/10785" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/10785</id>
  <updated>2026-06-15T01:35:12Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-06-15T01:35:12Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Panel: „Uniwersytet w środowisku lokalnym i globalnym”.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9979" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9979</id>
    <updated>2021-04-29T09:19:36Z</updated>
    <published>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Tytu&amp;#322;: Panel: „Uniwersytet w środowisku lokalnym i globalnym”.
Abstrakt: The panel discussion “The University in Local and Global Contexts” was the second part of the first day of the Conference “The Role and Status of the University in the 21st Century,” which took place from 5 to 6 October, 2018, at the University of Białystok. The main rationale behind organizing the discussion was to enable an exchange of opinions, arguments, and experiences concerning the local context of the university sensu largo and the mutual relations between the university and the local community (including the local and the regional authorities). The participants expressed their opinions about the changing role of the university in global and local contexts, and also in view of the imminent reform of the higher education in Poland. The panel organizers invited a number of notable participants: Professor Robert Ciborowski, Rector of the University of Białystok; Bohdan Paszkowski, Voivode of Podlasie; Professor Marcin Moniuszko, Prorector of Medical University in Białystok; Professor Jarosław Perszko, Prorector of Białystok University of Technology; Bogdan Dyjuk, member of the board of the Podlasie Voivodship; Waldemar Pawłowski, Cabinet Director for President of Białystok; and Jolanta Gadek, Director of the Książnica Podlaska Library in Białystok. The debate was chaired by Lech Pilarski, Polish Radio Białystok. The audience comprised conference participants, students and university staff members. The panel discussion opened with general remarks about the significance of the university for the local community and about the needs of the region that should be satisfied by local institutions of higher education. Later, the participants expressed their opinions about the role of academia in a non-academic context and shared with the audience their own understanding of what the university of the 21st century should be like. In conclusion of this part of the panel discussion Professor Moinuszko pointed to the fact that universities, in fact, create the needs of local communities, Professor Ławski remarked that a great potential hidden in the local specificity of the region has not been properly used so far, and Jolanta Gadek emphasized the university’s role in shaping the local culture. The representatives of the local authorities referred to the problem of investing in research activities. Professor Ciborowski quoted the words of Jacques Le Goff, and Waldemar Pawłowski resorted to the words of Kazimierz Wielki. In the following part of the panel discussion Lech Pilarski allowed for questions from the audience, which referred mainly to the problems and needs of students, researchers and academic teachers. The list of discussion participants includes: Professor Maciej Karczewski (the Institute of History and Political Science, the University of Białystok), Professor Alicja Kisielewska (the Institute of Cultural and Art Studies, the University of Białystok), Professor Jan Cieśliński (the Research Unit in Nonlinear Physics, the University of Białystok), Professor Lucyna Aleksandrowicz-Pędich (the Chair in English Studies, the University SWPS in Warsaw), Professor Stanisław Kistryn (the Jagiellonian University in Cracow), Professor Violetta Wejs-Milewska (the Chair in Interdisciplinary Philological Studies, the University of Białystok), Professor Izabela Święcicka (Prorector of the University of Białystok). A number of students and PhD students contributed to the discussion: Andrzej Kluczkowski (the Catholic University of Lublin), Urszula Lipato (the University of Białystok), and Edgar Filip Różycki (the University of Białystok). Understandably enough, one of the most important issues discussed during the debate was the reform of higher education in Poland. Once the scholars had expressed their opinions, arguments and doubts concerning the project of the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education, the representatives of the local authorities in Białystok were asked to share their views on the problem at hand. Finally, Lech Pilarski asked all the participants of the panel discussion whether in their opinion it was possible to create one big institution of higher education in Białystok. The participants’ voices were divided. The panel discussion gave an excellent opportunity to voice various opinions about the status of the contemporary university sensu largo, and about perspectives of its development in the future. The whole spectrum of the recalled experiences combined with the professional knowledge of the participants turned the meeting into a truly inspiring event, which undoubtedly enriched the ongoing Conference.
Opis: Prowadzenie Lech Pilarski, Białystok 5 października 2017 roku</summary>
    <dc:date>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>O fundamentach uniwersytetu XXI wieku w perspektywie humanistycznej. Funkcja akademickiej przestrzeni zmiennej</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9978" />
    <author>
      <name>Pilichiewicz, Kamil K.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9978</id>
    <updated>2021-04-29T09:19:31Z</updated>
    <published>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Tytu&amp;#322;: O fundamentach uniwersytetu XXI wieku w perspektywie humanistycznej. Funkcja akademickiej przestrzeni zmiennej
Autorzy: Pilichiewicz, Kamil K.
Abstrakt: The article is an attempt to answer the following question: is the university’s function subject to change in the globalizing, digitized and commercialized world? The concept of function (as a relation and as a specific action to meet needs) is analyzed both within and outside the context of university. The article presents different types of relations in the university space, emphasizing lack of the university’s autonomy against external factors, but also reminds us of the fact that the university finds its best expression in the fundamental relationship between the student and the teacher. The text draws on architectural comparisons, Malinowski's concepts, as well as on reflections of other humanists over the university walls covered with ivy.</summary>
    <dc:date>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Uniwersytet Podlaski – niedokończony projekt</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9977" />
    <author>
      <name>Sawicka-Mierzyńska, Katarzyna</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9977</id>
    <updated>2021-04-29T09:19:25Z</updated>
    <published>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Tytu&amp;#322;: Uniwersytet Podlaski – niedokończony projekt
Autorzy: Sawicka-Mierzyńska, Katarzyna
Abstrakt: The article sketches a local history of Polish higher education in in the 20th century. The author presents the debate on the founding of the Podlasie University, in which scholars and journalists took part. As we can see, there were conflicting opinions regarding the establishment of an independent university in Bialystok, which revealed the conflict of interests between the center and the province. The discussion took place in the journal Kontrasty and in other newspapers from 1985 to 1987</summary>
    <dc:date>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Doświadczenia z przeszłości: spór o reformę szkolnictwa wyższego w II RP a dyskusja dzisiejsza</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9976" />
    <author>
      <name>Sadowska, Joanna</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/11320/9976</id>
    <updated>2021-04-29T09:19:21Z</updated>
    <published>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Tytu&amp;#322;: Doświadczenia z przeszłości: spór o reformę szkolnictwa wyższego w II RP a dyskusja dzisiejsza
Autorzy: Sadowska, Joanna
Abstrakt: The current debate on the reform of higher education is reminiscent of the discussion in the Second Polish Republic from 1932 to 1933. At the time, the Ministry of Religions and Public Education headed by Janusz Jędrzejewicz, who was a collaborator of Józef Piłsudski, prepared a controversial project. It strengthened the role of the minister but limited the autonomy of the university and the rights of students. The academic milieu was galvanized. Professors wrote statements of protest to convince politicians to change their minds. Students organized strikes and demonstrations, and attacked supporters of the reform. These actions were ineffective, and in 1933 the new law on academic schools came into force. As a result, many university chairs and departments were liquidated. The minister dismissed professors who were regarded as opponents of the ‘Sanation’ regime. The law had almost no positive effect. Today it is important to ensure that the fatal errors from the 1930s are not repeated.</summary>
    <dc:date>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

